The bulk update request #7417 is pending approval.

change category ken_ashcorp (181) -> copyright
create implication kenny_(kenashcorp) (211) -> ken_ashcorp (181)
create implication absolute_territory_(song) (7) -> ken_ashcorp (181)
create implication crazy_chicks_(song) (2) -> ken_ashcorp (181)
create implication burgz_(song) (3) -> ken_ashcorp (181)

Reason: The tag for Ken Ashcorp's panda mascot is kenny_(kenashcorp), so ken_ashcorp should be in the copyright category instead to serve as the tag for all posts related to his music. His mascot (simce she is used to represent his music) and his songs should imply the copyright tag.

Do we tag songs...? I thought we'd just tag the band, and possibly have tags that relate to particular music videos if the image takes from it. But tagging the individual songs doesn't seem like a normal thing to do.

watsit said:
Do we tag songs...? I thought we'd just tag the band, and possibly have tags that relate to particular music videos if the image takes from it. But tagging the individual songs doesn't seem like a normal thing to do.

I tag them if they're notable or have visuals associated with them (the song tags here are mostly because people are parodying or drawing art of the visuals associated with the songs).

Some examples:

• rabbit_hole_(deco_27)
• never_gonna_give_you_up
• internet_yamero
• anaconda_(song)
• antonymph
• 2_phut_hon
• lone_digger
• donut_hole_(song)
• plastic_love
• rolling_girl

I could keep going, but you get the point.