The bulk update request #7552 has been rejected.

create alias girly_dominant (74) -> girly (0)
create alias dominant_girly (0) -> girly (0)
create alias girly_submissive (0) -> girly (0)
create alias submissive_girly (0) -> girly (0)

Reason: Girly is not a form, gender, or age. It does not need these specific tags.

topic #43711 & topic #43711 need to be rejected first.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7552 (forum #400502) has been rejected by @Donovan_DMC.

Please read topic #35343. Dominant feminine males is an incredibly common kink that the site does not provide any other way to search for, and people constantly ask about this tag in the forums for a reason. Aliasing them away is not the solution and making this one tag does not mean girly has to become another gender tag to get all of the possible combination tags.

We have muscular_dom and muscular_sub, "girly" can be used as an adjective to modify dom, not as a gendered tag combination.

nimphia said:
Please read topic #35343. Dominant feminine males is an incredibly common kink that the site does not provide any other way to search for, and people constantly ask about this tag in the forums for a reason. Aliasing them away is not the solution and making this one tag does not mean girly has to become another gender tag to get all of the possible combination tags.

We have muscular_dom and muscular_sub, "girly" can be used as an adjective to modify dom, not as a gendered tag combination.

Where is the line with these tags drawn then? girly/girly was aliased away.

donovan_dmc said:
Where is the line with these tags drawn then? girly/girly was aliased away.

I feel like girly/girly is in a similar situation, where I feel it's an interest a lot of people have that is currently not searchable, but it's not my focus in this case.

Like I said, I feel like the most obvious solution is to use girly as the modifier, in the same way the modifier in muscular_dom is muscular, not dom. That would make it so girly wouldn't be appropriate to substitute into tags in place of a gender/form/age group - the modifier in say, "athletic_girly" would be athletic, not girly, so it wouldn't work because it's combining two modifiers.

I think we should contain discussion of this topic to the existing thread though, there's a lot of insightful discussion in there already.

The bulk update request #7552 (forum #400502) has been rejected by @Donovan_DMC.