Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #7608 is pending approval.
create alias two-piece_swimsuit (85) -> bikini (74248)
create alias two_piece_swimsuit (158) -> bikini (74248)
Reason: This is just the same thing as a bikini, isn't it? That seems to be all these tags are used for, in any case.
It typically (or always?) contains a bikini_bottom, which on its own implies bikini, so following that logic it should count.
Should a lone bikini bottom really imply bikini, though?
scaliespe said:
The alternative here is to have both bikini and tankini imply two-piece_swimsuit, which sounds a bit pointless.
This would then result in bikini_bottom -> bikini -> two-piece_swimsuit, which is surely even more wrong.
faucet said:
This would then result in bikini_bottom -> bikini -> two-piece_swimsuit, which is surely even more wrong.
Right. Then the solution would be to remove the bikini_bottom and bikini_top implications from bikini. That doesn’t sound good either.
So yeah, still in favor of with aliasing two-piece to bikini and being done with it.
