The bulk update request #8041 has been rejected.

mass update chubby_girly -> slightly_chubby_femboy

Reason: Both the chubby_male/chubby_anthro/chubby_humanoid tags got updated to have the "slightly_" added towards the beginning, and it looks like girly got changed to femboy

So the chubby_girly tag is in need of an update too

EDIT: The bulk update request #8041 (forum #404567) has been rejected by @slyroon.

You already have a request for this tag: topic #44091

And like I told you there... slightly_chubby_male femboy will return what you're looking for with very few false positives.

nimphia said:
You already have a request for this tag: topic #44091

And like I told you there... slightly_chubby_male femboy will return what you're looking for with very few false positives.

Explain to be why muscular_girly was allowed to get updated to muscular_femboy but this tag is so sacrilegious

Especially when chubby_girly has over twice as many applicable posts as muscular_femboy right now

Also the only reason I submitted it as a bulk update request was because I felt it was more appropriate than an alias request

smuglytherat said:
Explain to be why muscular_girly was allowed to get updated to muscular_femboy but this tag is so sacrilegious

Especially when chubby_girly has over twice as many applicable posts as muscular_femboy right now

Also the only reason I submitted it as a bulk update request was because I felt it was more appropriate than an alias request

Because muscular_male femboy is primarily not going to be muscular femboys, while slightly_chubby_male femboy, again, primarily returns chubby femboys... The amount of posts in the tag isn't the issue, it's whether the tag is necessary for searching. If you can already search for something effectively another way without having to wade through pages upon pages of false positives, there isn't really a point in the tag existing.

nimphia said:
Because muscular_male femboy is primarily not going to be muscular femboys, while slightly_chubby_male femboy, again, primarily returns chubby femboys... The amount of posts in the tag isn't the issue, it's whether the tag is necessary for searching. If you can already search for something effectively another way without having to wade through pages upon pages of false positives, there isn't really a point in the tag existing.

You literally just used the same logic I used last time, I said

"Femboy and slightly_chubby_male does not narrow it down to a character that has both attributes, you'll often get a mix of those features split between two or more characters, and considering how many posts I was able to add that tag to already, I'd say it's a perfectly justified tag"

So I do think it's necessary for searching

smuglytherat said:
You literally just used the same logic I used last time, I said

"Femboy and slightly_chubby_male does not narrow it down to a character that has both attributes, you'll often get a mix of those features split between two or more characters, and considering how many posts I was able to add that tag to already, I'd say it's a perfectly justified tag"

So I do think it's necessary for searching

slightly_chubby_male femboy is almost exclusively chubby femboys though? It's literally not a mix where you have to dig through pages, it's just chubby femboys and the occasional false positive.

You're misunderstanding me, the issue is that this logic isn't... actually applicable to this case. Because it's predominantly correct for your search.

nimphia said:
slightly_chubby_male femboy is almost exclusively chubby femboys though? It's literally not a mix where you have to dig through pages, it's just chubby femboys and the occasional false positive.

When I was adding the tag to posts, I searched +slightly_chubby_male +girly (it wasn't femboy at the time) ‐chubby_girly in order to filter through posts that already had the tag and refreshed the page after I added it to all the posts where it was valid.

What was left was a ton of posts where chubby_girly would not have been applicable to the post after a while, so no, I don't feel it's exclusively chubby femboys, if anything is more like 25% chubby femboys hence why I feel the tag is necessary for searching

smuglytherat said:
When I was adding the tag to posts, I searched +slightly_chubby_male +girly (it wasn't femboy at the time) ‐chubby_girly in order to filter through posts that already had the tag and refreshed the page after I added it to all the posts where it was valid.

What was left was a ton of posts where chubby_girly would not have been applicable to the post after a while, so no, I don't feel it's exclusively chubby femboys, if anything is more like 25% chubby femboys hence why I feel the tag is necessary for searching

I don't know what you're talking about because slightly_chubby_male femboy -chubby_girly still mostly returns chubby femboys??

nimphia said:
I don't know what you're talking about because slightly_chubby_male femboy -chubby_girly still mostly returns chubby femboys??

I only saw two new posts where it was valid

smuglytherat said:
I only saw two new posts where it was valid

You must not be looking very hard, then, given all I'm seeing is chubby femboys.

The bulk update request #8041 (forum #404567) has been rejected by @slyroon.