Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #8278 has been rejected.
change category barbie_doll_anatomy (23) -> invalid
change category ken_doll_anatomy (9) -> invalid
Reason: featureless_crotch, featureless_chest and featureless_breasts already exist.
EDIT: The bulk update request #8278 (forum #406277) has been rejected by @theghost123.
Updated
Good suggestion. Dunno if I'm alone on this, but my brain always thinks "bimbo proportions" whenever I run across this term, so I find it misleading as well.
maybe this should just be aliased to featureless_(disambiguation), along with ken_doll_anatomy.
dba_afish said:
maybe this should just be aliased to featureless_(disambiguation), along with ken_doll_anatomy.
+1
The bulk update request #8282 is pending approval.
create alias barbie_doll_anatomy (23) -> featureless_(disambiguation) (3815)
create alias ken_doll_anatomy (9) -> featureless_(disambiguation) (3815)
Reason: these tags are just non-specific tags for characters with some combinations of featureless_* features.
These tags should be aliased to null_crotch or w/e bc im p sure thats what people mean by it
The bulk update request #8278 (forum #406277) has been rejected by @theghost123.
demesejha said:
These tags should be aliased to null_crotch or w/e bc im p sure thats what people mean by it
except it's also used for characters with featureless_breasts or featureless_chest without their crotch/genital area visible.
