The tag implication #63771 maid_marian -> robin_hood_(disney) has been rejected.

Reason: From the 1973 Disney film Robin Hood

Rejecting in favor of BUR #8428 and BUR #8429

EDIT: The tag implication maid_marian -> robin_hood_(disney) (forum #407471) has been rejected by @DirtyDerg.

I mean, I know this is a furry site and all, and she's probably responsible for half the furries here (Robin being responsible for the other half), but do we want to say all Maid Marian posts are from the Disney version? Could other versions not be furrified and posted here?

watsit said:
I mean, I know this is a furry site and all, and she's probably responsible for half the furries here (Robin being responsible for the other half), but do we want to say all Maid Marian posts are from the Disney version? Could other versions not be furrified and posted here?

post #1176325

nimphia said:
post #1176325

It looks like the implication used to exist, but was deleted at some point. Likely because of cases like that.

What could happen is a mass update of the current tags to the (disney) suffix, and imply those versions to robin_hood_(disney), then cleanup the few posts that aren't from the film.

mediocracy said:
What could happen is a mass update of the current tags to the (disney) suffix, and imply those versions to robin_hood_(disney), then cleanup the few posts that aren't from the film.

The only slight issue I could see with that is that Disney actually has two versions of the Robin Hood story; the one we're all familiar with, and The Story of Robin Hood and His Merrie Men (1952)
But, this is a furry website, so I'm sure there won't be a problem with having the 1952 version under the standard robin_hood tag, if there are any posts with that.

That, and there's a "live action" remake of the movie in the works ( article )

The bulk update request #8428 is pending approval.

mass update maid_marian -> maid_marian_(disney)
create implication maid_marian_(disney) (0) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
mass update little_john -> little_john_(disney)
create implication little_john_(disney) (0) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
mass update sheriff_of_nottingham -> sheriff_of_nottingham_(disney)
create implication sheriff_of_nottingham_(disney) (0) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
mass update king_richard -> king_richard_(disney)
create implication king_richard_(disney) (0) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
mass update prince_john -> prince_john_(disney)
create implication prince_john_(disney) (0) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
remove implication lady_kluck (95) -> robin_hood_(disney) (4500)
mass update robin_hood_(disney) -> disney's_robin_hood
change category disney's_robin_hood (0) -> copyright
create implication disney's_robin_hood (0) -> disney (134673)

Reason: Updating characters with suffix, implying characters to film, changing the film's name so that Robin Hood (the character), can be updated to the current robin_hood_(disney) in subsequent BUR. Category changes to character in subsequent as well.

The bulk update request #8429 is pending approval.

mass update robin_hood -> robin_hood_(disney)
create implication robin_hood_(disney) (4500) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
create implication lady_kluck (95) -> disney's_robin_hood (0)
change category robin_hood_(disney) (4500) -> character
change category maid_marian_(disney) (0) -> character
change category little_john_(disney) (0) -> character
change category sheriff_of_nottingham_(disney) (0) -> character
change category king_richard_(disney) (0) -> character
change category prince_john_(disney) (0) -> character

Reason: Part two. See prior BUR.

The tag implication maid_marian -> robin_hood_(disney) (forum #407471) has been rejected by @DirtyDerg.