The bulk update request #8653 is active.

create implication accidental_impregnation (45) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication anal_impregnation (189) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication breast_impregnation (21) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication indirect_impregnation (43) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication mixed_cum_impregnation (200) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication multiple_impregnation (169) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication self_impregnation (79) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication stacked_impregnation (21) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication testicle_impregnation (37) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication bestiality_impregnation (1658) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication bestiality_impregnation (1658) -> bestiality (85702)
create implication interspecies_impregnation (1910) -> impregnation (21333)
create implication interspecies_impregnation (1910) -> interspecies (310377)

Reason: I tried to collect all the reasonably useful *_impregnation tags and imply them to impregnation, let me know if any of these can be cut/added.

EDIT: The bulk update request #8653 (forum #409141) has been approved by @spe.

I was just about to create one of these when I noticed interspecies impreg didn't imply interspecies or impregnation already xD
There are barely any posts with the tag, but intraspecies_impregnation doesn't currently implicate impregnation or intraspecies, so that could be added to this script.

jerdude002 said:
I was just about to create one of these when I noticed interspecies impreg didn't imply interspecies or impregnation already xD
There are barely any posts with the tag, but intraspecies_impregnation doesn't currently implicate impregnation or intraspecies, so that could be added to this script.

Eh. seems kind of unnecessary to me, given that intraspecies impregnations are kind of assumed, really it's interspecies_impregnation that should be tagged more so people can exclude it if it irks them for some reason. But I'll add it anyway, since I don't really care for the "this tag is unnecessary and won't be used so it shouldn't have any implications" argument.

intraspecies_impregnation is the default, and we don't tag defaults. It is exactly equivalent to impregnation -interspecies_impregnation (given it is tagged properly). I recommend aliasing it to impregnation instead of legitimising the tag

snpthecat said:
intraspecies_impregnation is the default, and we don't tag defaults. It is exactly equivalent to impregnation -interspecies_impregnation (given it is tagged properly). I recommend aliasing it to impregnation instead of legitimising the tag

Eh, fair enough. I'll remove it and make a BUR.

The bulk update request #8839 is pending approval.

create alias intraspecies_impregnation (39) -> impregnation (21333)

Reason: Intraspecies impregnation seems to be the default, impregnation is generally something that only happens in the real world within species. Unnecessary tag.

pankino2002 said:
The bulk update request #8839 is pending approval.

create alias intraspecies_impregnation (39) -> impregnation (21333)

Reason: Intraspecies impregnation seems to be the default, impregnation is generally something that only happens in the real world within species. Unnecessary tag.

intraspecies intercourse is also the default, and yet sexual intercourse is generally something that only happens in the real world within species. Yet it is still a valid tag.

Intraspecies may be the "default" for sex and for impregnation, but interspecies and interspecies_impregnation etc. are very undertagged, just look at sex -interspecies -intraspecies and see how many there are that should be tagged interspecies. That assumption would be safe to make if things were tagged properly but they're far from that. Assuming tags will be correct and thorough enough to assume anything as "default" when literally anyone can edit tags and everyone has a different standard and knowledge of tags is not a good idea imo, I'd say it's better to just have the more specific tag as well as the general one. It will also likely be undertagged, but at least it's something :|

The bulk update request #8653 (forum #409141) has been approved by @spe.

jerdude002 said:
Intraspecies may be the "default" for sex and for impregnation, but interspecies and interspecies_impregnation etc. are very undertagged, just look at sex -interspecies -intraspecies and see how many there are that should be tagged interspecies.

Adding more tags won't fix undertagging, it will just create more tags that are undertagged. Better to put effort into tagging interspecies tags to more fully flesh them out, than to put effort into tagging intraspecies tags, leaving interspecies tags undertagged and intraspecies tags also ending up undertagged.