Topic: [APPROVED] Some Implications/Aliases for Dota related tags

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #8686 is active.

create implication dota (2674) -> valve (7028)
create implication hoodwink_(dota) (419) -> dota (2674)
create implication bane_(dota) (7) -> dota (2674)
create implication marci_(dota) (7) -> dota (2674)
create implication tusk_(dota) (28) -> dota (2674)
create implication ursa_(dota) (1) -> dota (2674)
create alias ymir_the_tusk (5) -> tusk_(dota) (28)

Reason: Dota is a valve developed game. Plus there are some missing character implications of characters from the franchise.

Ymir the Tusk is the full name for the hero simply known as Tusk in-game.
https://www.dota2.com/hero/tusk (In the Full History section)

EDIT: The bulk update request #8686 (forum #409454) has been approved by @scaliespe.

Updated by auto moderator

Reason: Dota is a valve developed game.

Not quite--Dota 2 is a Valve developed game. Dota covers both DotA (the mod for Warcraft III, which was made by Blizzard who will forever be butthurt that they let the DotA IP get away) and Dota 2, which is being developed by Valve.

Technically since Valve currently owns the DotA IP it should be implicated to Valve, but I don't know exactly how that works for fanart created for the original mod, or before DotA was acquired by Valve in 2009. Maybe it'd be better to split dota into defense_of_the_ancients and dota_2. I dunno. Copyright tags aren't my forte.

EDIT: On inspection, there doesn't seem to be any DotA related art on e621 uploaded before DotA was acquired by valve, and I doubt anyone's going to go back and check if anything specifically references the mod instead of Dota 2, so I rescind my "uhm actually" and support this.

Updated

  • 1