The tag alias #71600 wings_on_back -> back_wings has been approved.

Reason: Both tags mean the same thing.

EDIT: The tag alias wings_on_back -> back_wings (forum #410513) has been approved by @spe.

Do we need a "back wings" tag when the default for wings on anthros is assumed to be coming from the back? I think wings -winged_arms accomplishes the same thing, pretty much.

pankino2002 said:
[...]the default for wings on anthros is assumed to be coming from the back?

are they, though? looking at anthro birds and anthro bats (ignoring Rouge) it seems like a pretty even split, at least even enough to not call one the "default".

Why do none of these tags imply wings?

dba_afish said:
are they, though? looking at anthro birds and anthro bats (ignoring Rouge) it seems like a pretty even split, at least even enough to not call one the "default".

I wouldn't say they're an even split, solo anthro bird winged_arms has about 1/3rd the results as solo anthro bird wings -winged_arms

Although I think a lot of the results in winged_arms are either not winged arms or feather hands instead. Point taken, though, there's more diversity than I thought.

pankino2002 said:
Do we need a "back wings" tag when the default for wings on anthros is assumed to be coming from the back? I think wings -winged_arms accomplishes the same thing, pretty much.

that would require alot more exclusions. There are also butt_wings, head_wings, feather_Hands(also visually and functionally still wings at the same time more than half the time), among many others..

Wings on back and back wings don’t imply wings, but butt wings does 😭

The bulk update request #8799 is active.

create implication back_wings (1853) -> wings (413080)

Reason: there

EDIT: The bulk update request #8799 (forum #410529) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #8799 (forum #410529) has been approved by @spe.

The tag alias wings_on_back -> back_wings (forum #410513) has been approved by @spe.