Silly little exercise born out of curiousity. Here's mine:
post #1756098
Since it's on my blacklist (young -rating_s), I am not particularly pleased about this being the case for me. I do like how the comment section is reciting All Star by Smash Mouth, though.
Topic: Find the Post ID to match your User ID!
Posted under Off Topic
Not bad. Kinda vanilla for my tastes.
Could've been much worse.
Not my thing, but really could be a lot worse.
I am lucky?
Babs Bunny lol, it's ok...
https://e621.net/posts/46595
It's... meh...
Updated by Donovan DMC
love the trepidation of this thread so far! imagine if user 6268 sees this thread
anyways here's mine; absolutely love it!
post #884003
post #408179
A good 'mon.
hmm
not really into it but it's not bad
maybe a little strange for my tastes
Not particularly my thing, but oh well.
Images from 12 years ago really shows how far we've come today in terms of quality
post #14014
What. Talk about opposites. :|
Mine is deleted =(
post #45681
It was a cynder post, though, which is a funny little coincidence.
Also deleted
i use vinyl as my identity at that popular mlp booru of account that is 2 years younger than e6's. prophecy is a lovely thing
post #732974
Eh, it's not particularly interesting
And extending it to comments...
comment #732974
post #323290
Some pony stuff
what the fuck even is this post #752426
Tangentially, this looks like it should be tagged scalie, no? Kinda dinosaur-esque head shape? That would be fitting, if so.
fuck i'm old
Mine gives:
Not found.
oof, I hope it wasn't anything too bad.
dba_afish said:
I mean it's, like, a car, so-- no? probably shouldn't even be tagged anthro, actually.
Well I’d say it looks a lot more anthro than humanoid. Humanoids should have a human-shaped head in most cases.
Meh, lame result.
Updated
spe said:
Well I’d say it looks a lot more anthro than humanoid. Humanoids should have a human-shaped head in most cases.
I believe that the general consensus is that anthro should only be applied to characters whose design was primarily based on an animal. so, with aeromorphs, elementals, ani-inis, and the like it shouldn't be applied (unless they have explicitly animal features). essentially, if the character could be "reverted" into feral form without changing its species then its anthro, if it'd be reverted into a dire_machine or something else than it's humanoid. (or, more simply, not_furry and anthro should be mutually exclusive.)
I'm having a hard time finding any statements from staff on the subject, although I do remember this topic being discussed...
Oh look, something wholesome for a change.
cinder said:
Mine is deleted =(
post #45681
Unless you have something you're not telling us, that's not your user ID. The actual post #160505 also happens to be deleted, but in this case it's because of a superior version:
wat8548 said:
Unless you have something you're not telling us, that's not your user ID. The actual post #160505 also happens to be deleted, but in this case it's because of a superior version:
it appears that somehow the thread's ID (topic #45681) got used by accident.
I'll play.
Post: post #318479
Comment: comment #318479
Pool, set, ticket, alias, implication, BUR: none that high yet
Tag: no longer used - aliased to 709624, maleherm/gynomorph
Epoch: 1970-01-04 16:27:59 UTC
Spreadsheet 1900: 2771-12-18
Spreadsheet 1904: 2775-12-19
Nearest primes: 318,473 and 318,503
Roud folk song index: none that high yet
dripen_arn said:
... imagine if user 6268 sees this thread...
last commented: over 13 years ago
-_-
I was concerned when I saw it blacklisted. Very anticlimactic.
dba_afish said:
I believe that the general consensus is that anthro should only be applied to characters whose design was primarily based on an animal. so, with aeromorphs, elementals, ani-inis, and the like it shouldn't be applied (unless they have explicitly animal features). essentially, if the character could be "reverted" into feral form without changing its species then its anthro, if it'd be reverted into a dire_machine or something else than it's humanoid. (or, more simply, not_furry and anthro should be mutually exclusive.)I'm having a hard time finding any statements from staff on the subject, although I do remember this topic being discussed...
Well, this character does have explicitly animal features. A snout, with a distinctly (I wanna say dinosaur?) shaped head. Nothing you would find on a car. Basically it seems anthro in every way but the body texture which is apparently metal, with some possibly mechanical parts, but I think that just makes it a mechanical anthro. Compare post #3726200 (also tagged anthro… and in this case I actually disagree) that is basically just a human with a car for a head and no animal traits.
Granted, this is also just my understanding of it and the anthro/humanoid wikis don’t explicitly cover this situation one way or another. The only really relevant info in the wiki is this:
Anthros tend to retain an animal-like facial structure, most prominently a snout. Creatures with fully human-like faces are typically humanoid instead of anthro.
…which I interpret as basically any biped with a snout (excepting animal head humanoids and including flat-faced species) is anthro.
post #299180
meh.
comment #299180 is somewhat amusing so there's that
Well, technically it's just a deleted (inferior) image. But if you follow the links, it ends up there.
It's straight porn :(
post #27213
Pikaporn
post #589978
Mine is pretty stranded but it's not bad, and like many have said already it could have been so much worse
post #1391403
That's some cool artwork right there, also Warcraft, I fw Warcraft
Oh, now that's a bit of old-school style furry art.
For a lot of other things, it looks like most are deleted or don't exist yet. So there's not much to see there. However... this is a bit amusing blip #105815
post #69399
Why the long face?
thehuskyk9 said:
post #69399
Why the long face?
The areolas...
Mine is deleted. A tragedy. But through some detective sleuthing work through secret archives I figured that it's this picture still available on rule 34. And I think it's a not too shabby picture. Could be worse.
oh hey, some completely ordinary furry porn. or, well, erotica, i guess? not as explicit as most stuff here
I can vibe with this
How do I find my user ID?
protox3alt said:
How do I find my user ID?
Go to your profile. The number at the end of the URL is your user ID.
protox3alt said:
How do I find my user ID?
you can also just change users to posts from your user page web address
https://e621.net/users/504160
https://e621.net/posts/504160
amigaman said:
post #483237Mine is deleted. A tragedy. But through some detective sleuthing work through secret archives I figured that it's this picture still available on rule 34. And I think it's a not too shabby picture. Could be worse.
When you can recognize the site it's grabbed from, from the tags (AGN.PH most likely).
post #284012
Couldn't have asked for a better picture
I'm cool with this.
Lovely~
post #1368948
No fucking way
:(
protox3alt said:
How do I find my user ID?
....ok
All the characters are cutoff; doesn't really have much context. But then again at least it's not something terrible or way outside my interests.
bossmt-2 said:
https://e621.net/posts/908929All the characters are cutoff; doesn't really have much context. But then again at least it's not something terrible or way outside my interests.
If only it were this.
:P
Updated by Donovan DMC
post #1518550
I actually thought those were the eyes for a minute...
kemonophonic said:
If only it were this.:P
Three years and two months!! Finally!! I've been waiting for the day someone would call me out on it. Congratulations...!
bossmt-2 said:
Three years and two months!! Finally!! I've been waiting for the day someone would call me out on it. Congratulations...!
I don't own an MT-2 but I do own a DS-1W and FZ-1W, among other guitar pedals.
Updated by Donovan DMC
i give 7/10. faces could be better to my taste and the angle needs a little work. but very lucky given how lengthy my blacklist is that something relatively hot popped up!
also, noticing the description is seven minutes in heaven i've actually been in that situation, except we were sucking each other off. not missing enough IQ points to risk A**S upstairs at a party lmao (does the sexually explicit comment rule count for forums? don't think so but if so i'll delete👍)
Updated
wwwwwwwww said:
(does the sexually explicit comment rule count for forums? don't think so but if so i'll delete👍)
The code of conduct really should be clarified on this front, tbh.
kemonophonic said:
I don't own an MT-2 but I do own a DS-1W and FZ-1W, among other guitar pedals.
It's nowhere near as awful as most say it is... at least when paired with something (TS9 or similar). But already having a DS-1 you're probably not missing out on much.
late to the party but its gay pron post #476767
Oddly drawn dong plus I'm not into felids, but hey, this is not that bad honestly
post #280767
I would have preferred if it was something not on my blacklist...
(The tag triggering it being penis_piercing if you're wondering. Piercings, especially in sensitive areas, give me the jibblies, I can't help it...)
all i have to say is :(