Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #8990 is pending approval.
create alias larger_prey (1011) -> smaller_pred (1278)
create alias smaller_prey (4449) -> larger_pred (5486)
create implication larger_pred (5486) -> size_difference (349897)
create implication smaller_pred (1278) -> size_difference (349897)
Reason: These pred/prey size tags are relational. It does not make sense that larger_pred -smaller_prey is a non-empty search, much less one with 16 pages.
The first two should be aliases, not implications. Larger prey means smaller pred, having both tags is redundant.
A bidirectional implication should always be an alias (is a circular implication even possible? That seems like it would break something, since the tag is then implying itself).
scth said:
(is a circular implication even possible? That seems like it would break something, since the tag is then implying itself).
No, the BUR will error when approved
I see. My bad, I'm new to the BUR stuff.
I changed the BUR to set the prey size tags as aliases of the pred size tags.
