Currently, this tag has almost 600 posts for female_urethra and no wiki. I can understand the direction someone would be going for with a tag like this, but I don't believe its name is correct.
Any suggestions on what we should do with this tag?
Topic: Female Urethra; is it a useful tag, and should we re-name it or get rid of it?
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
Why wouldn't it be useful? And what do you think is incorrect about it?
The bulk update request #9288 is pending approval.
create alias female_urethra (602) -> urethra (17398)
Reason: Yeah I don't like this one either
there's 50 pages of solo female urethras that are not tagged with that. sounds redundant, but i guess it depends on if it's a big enough distinction to the people searching for urethras-
oop, was typing as the alias was posted.
dba_afish said:
well, there's the gender problem, female has a fairly strict definition on here. where as, depending on definition, a tag like this could apply to characters within up to four of the seven gender categories.
This; I can understand someone wanting a distinction between genitalia, but it shouldn't be gendered.
It might matter to have a seperate tag if people are looking for herms that specifically have a urethra within the vulva in addition to the penis but that would need a diferent name to not just be tagged with any female, or set, also rather niche.
dba_afish said:
well, there's the gender problem, female has a fairly strict definition on here. where as, depending on definition, a tag like this could apply to characters within up to four of the seven gender categories.
I wonder if it could be renamed to something like vulval urethra