The tag implication #65456 fatal_vore -> death has been rejected.

Reason: I'm not sure if the death tag requires showing an actual lifeless body, but it's used on plenty of fatal_vore content where no lifeless bodies are shown already, and since necrophilia implicates death already, it'd be pretty hard to argue that the death tag should be reserved for when a character is shown dying.

I'm not 100% confident that this new implication would be productive based on how the death tag is used, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Worst case I learn how to tag better.

EDIT: The tag implication fatal_vore -> death (forum #422255) has been rejected by @spe.

tokwas said:
Reason: I'm not sure if the death tag requires showing an actual lifeless body, but it's used on plenty of fatal_vore content where no lifeless bodies are shown already, and since necrophilia implicates death already, it'd be pretty hard to argue that the death tag should be reserved for when a character is shown dying.

I'm not 100% confident that this new implication would be productive based on how the death tag is used, but I figured I'd give it a shot. Worst case I learn how to tag better.

Implication has been rejected before, see topic #28834.

With fatal_vore, you can see characters being at risk of imminent_death or in the process of dying, and not necessarily death itself.

The tag implication fatal_vore -> death (forum #422255) has been rejected by @spe.