The tag implication #65524 casual_birthing -> birth is pending approval.

Reason: seems obvious to me, I was surprised to discover there were cases where the first tag is present and not the second

I wonder if we’d be better off pointing this to live_birth instead, since birth can refer to both live birth and hatching.
Then again, post #4975130 seems to depict… casual hatching? I’m not entirely sure if that should count or not.

spe said:
I wonder if we’d be better off pointing this to live_birth instead, since birth can refer to both live birth and hatching.

I was under the impression that live_birth is a redundant tag, and you seemed to agree with that here? Was there any other discussion about including hatching in the definition of birth?

moonlit-comet said:
I was under the impression that live_birth is a redundant tag, and you seemed to agree with that here? Was there any other discussion about including hatching in the definition of birth?

I guess I changed my mind? I don't know, it's hard to remember all of this stuff. I did suggest having both hatching and birth imply live_birth probably... 2 years ago? I'm not sure if it's still worth trying to maintain the distinction, but I made a new BUR to get some votes on the idea so we can finally figure it out one way or another.