Topic: Tag implication: fox_spirit -> mythological_fox

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #9680 is pending approval.

remove implication huli_jing (8) -> mythological_fox (464)
remove implication kumiho (314) -> mythological_fox (464)
remove implication nogitsune (28) -> mythological_fox (464)
create implication huli_jing (8) -> fox_spirit (2550)
create implication kumiho (314) -> fox_spirit (2550)
create implication nogitsune (28) -> fox_spirit (2550)

Reason: If we want to get technical, huli_jing, kumiho, and nogitsune should be de-implicated from mythological_fox and re-implcated to fox_spirit, since that's what they are.

Of course, this brings up whether there's any point to keeping mythological_fox. I say yes. There aren't that many mythological foxes that aren't fox spirits, but we do have a picture of the Teumessian vixen of Greek myth and a tulikettu of Finnish myth. Naturally, we can't imply the Teumessian fox to mythological fox due to being a character instead of a species, but we can safely imply tulikettu. Perhaps someday we'll also have an aguara as well (hint, hint ;) ).

Edit: Because I may have screwed up with the above (see below), tulikettu has been removed from this BUR (also see below).

Updated

The bulk update request #9681 is pending approval.

create implication tulikettu (1) -> mythological_fox (464)

Reason: Because it could be a problem in the above BUR, separating out the tulikettu implication in light of

thegreatwolfgang said:
Might want to consider the reason they were separated in the first place, see topic #30625.

I wasn't in the Discord for that discussion, so I'm not clear on the logic. :\ Nevertheless, if I put my foot in my mouth (again), tulikettu is now in its own BUR.

  • 1