Implicating sea -> water .

Reason: seas contain water amiright.

Done

Edit: Just thought of something;
What about large bodies of liquid that contain something other than water?
Such as blood, urine etc?
Granted , there doesn't seem to be any of those images on the site so far (other than a literal pool of urine in post #94514), but if the implication's approved, we couldn't be able to tag anything but a regular sea with sea

Thanks for bringing it up again slyroon, been meaning to ask everyone again
-
Since we're on the topic of water bodies, does anyone object to the implications (or aliases) in forum #37234?

titaniachkt said:
Edit: Just thought of something;
What about large bodies of liquid that contain something other than water?
Such as blood, urine etc?
Granted , there doesn't seem to be any of those images on the site so far (other than a literal pool of urine in post #94514), but if the implication's approved, we couldn't be able to tag anything but a regular sea with sea

I'd say revisit the subject when it pops up. Alternatively, a regular sea or other body of water can be just plain sea or whatever that body of water is and, for non-water seas/bodies of whatever, add what that stuff is to the tag.

For example:

sea (with water) --> sea
sea (with blood) --> sea_of_blood or blood_sea or sea_(blood)
pool (with urine) --> pool_of_urine or urine_pool or pool_(urine)

And so on. Granted, it'll have to be maintained over time, but that's true with most tags anyway.

Clawstripe said:
I'd say revisit the subject when it pops up. Alternatively, a regular sea or other body of water can be just plain sea or whatever that body of water is and, for non-water seas/bodies of whatever, add what that stuff is to the tag.

For example:

sea (with water) --> sea
sea (with blood) --> sea_of_blood or blood_sea or sea_(blood)
pool (with urine) --> pool_of_urine or urine_pool or pool_(urine)

And so on. Granted, it'll have to be maintained over time, but that's true with most tags anyway.

Great idea Clawstripe!

I like the *_(*) format, since it's relatively easy to organize and search for in comparison to the extended main tag (*_of_x)

With that in mind, the implication sea -> water will probably be done by tomorrow if there are no objections

titaniachkt said:
Great idea Clawstripe!

I like the *_(*) format, since it's relatively easy to organize and search for in comparison to the extended main tag (*_of_x)

Thank you. Also, the *_(*) format fits with the style of other tags we have, so that's a plus in its favor.

I made the thing, but I think sea_of_x is just more common a thing for people to tag as it's usually said that way too