Implicating foursome → group_sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Threesome (three) and orgy (five+) are already implicated..

yes

Thanks.
Foursome should probably also be unimplicated from group. Since that's redundant with the foursome → group_sex → group implication chain.

Genjar said:
Thanks.
Foursome should probably also be unimplicated from group. Since that's redundant with the foursome → group_sex → group implication chain.

We have multiple tags implicating other tags? I thought it wasn't possible

I guess I'll leave it because it's not really hurting to have two tags implicate it as the tag will only be added once anyway

Rainbow_Dash said:
We have multiple tags implicating other tags? I thought it wasn't possible

Only with the aliases, as far as I know.
...I just tried to submit an alias for kaze_nin → kajinchu (the former is a mistranslation), couldn't because it's already aliased.

Anyway, yeah, I suppose there's no harm in leaving those duplicates in. I was just worried that they put extra strain on the servers.