This implication caused gay images tagged with facesitting to have the vaginal tag and it can't be removed.

TheHuskyK9 said:
This implication caused gay images tagged with facesitting to have the vaginal tag and it can't be removed.

already removed, can you fix the damaged images?

Aurali said:
already removed, can you fix the damaged images?

Yep

TheHuskyK9 said:
This implication caused gay images tagged with facesitting to have the vaginal tag and it can't be removed.

I took care of it before in a report, dont worry it seems to have been taken care of

why in god's name was this approved? men can't have their faces sat on?

Finished fixing the images. I'm gonna go take a nap

ippiki_ookami said:
why in god's name was this approved? men can't have their faces sat on?

Nope. never. only lesbians can sit on each other's faces

The wiki, at the time of the implication suggestion, stated that facesitting was a specific femdom act that involved cunnilingus.

That's why I suggested the implication in the first place, when it was suggested that we instead change the wiki definition I certainly agreed since that also solved the issue.

Whomever it was that approved the implication must not have read the thread about it, or they disagreed with the solution that we came up with.

Hammie said:
The wiki, at the time of the implication suggestion, stated that facesitting was a specific femdom act that involved cunnilingus.

That's why I suggested the implication in the first place, when it was suggested that we instead change the wiki definition I certainly agreed since that also solved the issue.

Whomever it was that approved the implication must not have read the thread about it, or they disagreed with the solution that we came up with.

Yeah I had to fix it, a user who made that entry was warned about gender wiki entries as they rule a lot of things out that are true to be false.