Aliasing not_gay → invalid_tag
Link to alias

Reason:

Ive seen more than one person use this tag in the past 4 years ive been here. It keeps poppping up even after being eradicated.

Balls aren't touching.

no homo

They didn't kiss.

Moon_Moon said:
They didn't kiss.

The video proves otherwise. :3

furballs_dc said:
The video proves otherwise. :3

you can't prove it was me :P

Theclarinetist said:
you can't prove it was me :P

Huehuehue...

furballs_dc said:
Huehuehue...

don't you "huehuehue" me! i'll get the drop bears!

:P

What is this, the new forum games? :/

Anyway, from what I can see, it's tagged for posts where someone denies that they're gay. Doesn't seem too useful, but I don't see the need to invalidate it. Maybe alias it to stated_heterosexuality? That'd make it more uniform with stated_homosexuality.

Genjar said:
What is this, the new forum games? :/

Anyway, from what I can see, it's tagged for posts where someone denies that they're gay. Doesn't seem too useful, but I don't see the need to invalidate it. Maybe alias it to stated_heterosexuality? That'd make it more uniform with stated_homosexuality.

Apparently flooding the tag posts with inane bullshit is the new game.

Also +1 what you said.

Genjar said:
What is this, the new forum games? :/

Anyway, from what I can see, it's tagged for posts where someone denies that they're gay. Doesn't seem too useful, but I don't see the need to invalidate it. Maybe alias it to stated_heterosexuality? That'd make it more uniform with stated_homosexuality.

I like this.

Genjar said:
What is this, the new forum games? :/

Anyway, from what I can see, it's tagged for posts where someone denies that they're gay. Doesn't seem too useful, but I don't see the need to invalidate it. Maybe alias it to stated_heterosexuality? That'd make it more uniform with stated_homosexuality.

sounds ok ta' me...