Topic: Tag Alias: face_fuck -> deep_throat

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

they ARE both fellatio, so that should be. face fucking and deep throating COULD be considered different things, but generally speaking, it does not appear to be so. so I'd say merge 'em together and go for it.

then again, I have little interest in blow job pictures. Maybe someone more familiar with the tags would weigh in...

Updated by anonymous

Kald

Former Staff

Face fuck implies either humping the face or forcing it onto the crotch, while deep throating can happen with the one being sucked staying totally passive.

Updated by anonymous

Kald said:
Face fuck implies either humping the face or forcing it onto the crotch, while deep throating can happen with the one being sucked staying totally passive.

So face_fuck should imply deep_throat, cause char 1 fucking char 2's face means char 2 is deep throating and a face giving fellatio being forced into the crotch is also deep throating. Right?

Updated by anonymous

not nessecarily.. and it's hard to tell one-or-the other in a still image:

post #136931 - is he cupping his chin, or holdingh is face still?
post #135626 - aside the fact that those are two girls... is she petting her hair, or forcing her down? it looks pretty tender to me,
post #137543 - this clearly isn't a face_fuck, despite having the tag.
post #96724 - this looks pretty relaxed to me. Neither is passive, neither is forceful.

some things are a LOT more obvious (post #124065 post #97537 post #139090 ) but in general, ... not really. I don't think the tag is being used properly often enough to make it 'worth' differentiating...

but. That's my opinion :P

Updated by anonymous

Then perhaps some disambiguation between what's a face fuck, what's a blow job, and whats a deep throating? I mean, the one thing I'm noticing in all those pictures is the one with the cock's hand being on the other's head- Which seems to suggest that that's where the drive of "face_fuck" being tagged is coming from.

Updated by anonymous

which is a horrible way about deciding it because, well, damn. If you're not touching the person sucking you off in some way, your'e doin' it wrong.

the definition of 'face fuck' should be some measure of force, IMO. Something that illustrates the one being pleasured is being aggresive and controlling, and vigorous... and that the one giving pleasure is not in control.

I also don't think that a cock need be involved. If face_fuck is an aggressive blowjob, what's the word for the female equivalent? Face_fuck still works.

Updated by anonymous

I agree- I was just pointing out that that seemed to eb where the similarity lay within each picture.

It should be an easily observable measure of force being applied to the one going down on the other, either in a way that implies nonconsensual behaviour (face rape, basically) or aggressiveness (when they -really- wanna get that cock all the way to the back of the throat, or drown their muzzle in pussy juice).

Updated by anonymous

Actually I think the face_fuck term should only be used for a penis fucking a face, not when a vagina is involved in the face fucking, that should stay as cunnilingus and hand_on_head. Cause that's all that really seems different from deep_throat and face_fuck, the one giving the blowjob has the one getting the blowjob placing their hand on the back of the giver's head.
post #135703 is tagged face_fuck, but not deep_throat or fellatio...
post #21533 and post #90038 should both be tagged face_fuck imo.

Also, this other tag, forced_oral. forced_oral seems to have the same meaning as face_fuck, except it's not always deepthroating and can sometimes include rape. Maybe face_fuck should be aliased to forced_oral, with the method of searching for face_fuck pics being searching forced_oral hand_on_head fellatio or forced_oral hand_on_head cunnilingus.

Updated by anonymous

My thought is to ditch face_fuck. Use forced_oral and hand_on_head where appropriate. :) so, basically, yeah, what river said. :)

Updated by anonymous

Anything that has the hand on the head without being forced oral wouldn't properly classify as a face fuck anyways, so I think that's the best of all worlds.

tl;dr: I agree.

Updated by anonymous

Face-fucking can occur without deep-throating, really, if they are shallower thrusts. You can still have your hands on the persons' head and be humping away without cramming a dick down the throat. The only thing I fully agree with is that face_fuck and deep_throat should both imply fellatio, if they don't already. But deep throating and face fucking can each occur without the other.

Updated by anonymous

RedOctober said:
Face-fucking can occur without deep-throating, really, if they are shallower thrusts. You can still have your hands on the persons' head and be humping away without cramming a dick down the throat. The only thing I fully agree with is that face_fuck and deep_throat should both imply fellatio, if they don't already. But deep throating and face fucking can each occur without the other.

this isn't a face_fuck -> deep_throat implication discussion thread. Also, approving the face_fuck -> forced_oral alias once I add hand_on_head to face_fuck pics currently tagged.

Updated by anonymous

Riversyde said:
this isn't a face_fuck -> deep_throat implication discussion thread. Also, approving the face_fuck -> forced_oral alias once I add hand_on_head to face_fuck pics currently tagged.

It may not be, but he does have a point when it comes to deep_throat; It should imply fellatio if it doesn't already.

Also, couldn't you just add an implication to face_fuck to add hand_on_head, then alias it to forced_oral after to make it keep the hand_on_head tag to all current face_fuck pictures, and have them all changed to forced_oral afterwards? i'm not exactly well versed (or any sort of versed, really) in the way things work behind the scenes, but it seems like it should work from my POV.

Updated by anonymous

123easy said:
It may not be, but he does have a point when it comes to deep_throat; It should imply fellatio if it doesn't already.

Yeah, it already does.

Also, couldn't you just add an implication to face_fuck to add hand_on_head, then alias it to forced_oral after to make it keep the hand_on_head tag to all current face_fuck pictures, and have them all changed to forced_oral afterwards? i'm not exactly well versed (or any sort of versed, really) in the way things work behind the scenes, but it seems like it should work from my POV.

Not all the posts tagged with face_fuck also had a hand on a head in the picture. So I had to add them manually.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1