Riversyde said:
I don't really see why we need average_breasts, but if it improves searchability, I'm all for it. Other than that, I have no problems with anything here.

And this is why the arguing against the huge breasts implying big breasts, and hyper implying huge and thus big. -.- It devalues searchability for the sub-sizes. Especially since the sizes have upper limits. They're individual size catagories, not "these are all big breasts".

The earlier remark of all the different tags of breasts and breast sizes that people have tagged: Not always do people just tag what first comes to mind. there've been plenty that purposefully go against the standard tags just for the lulz of it, within breasts or otherwise. I've edited quite a few of those already. There'll always be people who just don't give two shits or work to troll people deliberately.

Regarding size descriptions: looks good.

123easy said:
And this is why the arguing against the huge breasts implying big breasts, and hyper implying huge and thus big. -.- It devalues searchability for the sub-sizes. Especially since the sizes have upper limits. They're individual size catagories, not "these are all big breasts"

except, again, that any any point in time, all you have to do is remove the next largest category from your search.

You yourself a few months ago had suggested FAR more conveluted search patterns for other things :<

there've been plenty that purposefully go against the standard tags just for the lulz of it, within breasts or otherwise. I've edited quite a few of those already. There'll always be people who just don't give two shits or work to troll people deliberately.

if you finds someone who is deliberatly TROLLING with tags, please inform myself or another moderator. tag trolling is the same as tag vadalism.

Regarding size descriptions: looks good.

Yay! we agree on that at least. :)

Progress! *dances*

Okay, who's in? Snow, 123easy, and I... ultima, too? Anyone else want to join the fun?

(suddenly Huck Finn and Tom Saywer come to mind... the painting/white-washing of a certain fence) :p

honestly my participation is minimal at the moment--I"ve been REALLY busy with some other projects :( but I'll do what i can when I can :D

SnowWolf said:
except, again, that any any point in time, all you have to do is remove the next largest category from your search.

You yourself a few months ago had suggested FAR more conveluted search patterns for other things :<

Never for something that was counterintuitive systematically. This is. Every other metatag format holds multiple tags within it without those tags being associated aside frlom said metatag, which is what cross-references them. This not only breaks that format, but does it in a skewed format where the larger it is, the more tags it shares with its predecessors, when said tags reference a particular format that the larger tags do not conform to.

Well... I guess I'll start at the beginning and work the 'small_breasts' and 'average_breasts' tags. I'll try to sort the 'big', 'huge', and 'hyper' as I go, but someone may want to verify or check other tags. (I have the 'big three' blacklisted, atm. Granted, that could be changed easily enough.)

I guess we could either coordinate on this forum or by PM for who will cover what.

Are the wiki pages updated?

Cheers!