I want to use the train tag to refer to images containing the railway vehicle and use train_position to refer to the images containing the sexual position. I think the two concepts are different enough to warrant to separate tags. So we would have:

a) pictures of people on a train.

b) pictures of people in a train_position.

c) pictures of people in a train_position on a train.

If anyone has any objections, please speak now or forever hold your peace.

KloH0und said:

c) pictures of people in a train_position on a train.

Are there such images?

But really, I'm in favor.

Well, I mean hypothetically.

Right now there isn't anything like that on here. I'm more worried about distinguishing things like this:

post #6254

from things like this:

post #167025

Oh, no, I understood. I just got excited thinking about trains on trains. It's so meta.

Really? Then I bet this turns you on.

Seriously though, If no one sees anything wrong with this I'll switch up the tags tonight.

KloH0und said:
Really? Then I bet this turns you on.

Seriously though, If no one sees anything wrong with this I'll switch up the tags tonight.

Go for it dood!

KloH0und said:
Really? Then I bet this turns you on.

Yup.

I am opposed to this. I hate trains, they're loud as fuck.

ippiki_ookami said:
I am opposed to this. I hate trains, they're loud as fuck.

Screw you. Trains are awesome. >:| Nah, I'm teasin'. Seriously, tho, don't dis diesels. Don't slam steam. I like trains. On the topic of the tags though, maybe call one a railroad_train and the other a sex_train

JoeX said:
Screw you. Trains are awesome. >:| Nah, I'm teasin'. Seriously, tho, don't dis diesels. Don't slam steam. I like trains. On the topic of the tags though, maybe call one a railroad_train and the other a sex_train

No, I think Klo's version is better. Sex_train isn't as concrete as train_position. Could be like a party bus, but a sex train. Similarly, not all choochoo trains run on railroads. Maglevs (real) and any sci-fi trains may not have rails.

This was actually going to be another discussion for me to bring up:

I propose we use train_position not only to refer to describe the sexual position, but also to refer to a group of people arranged in a line with non-sexual physical contact between the individuals (e.g. a conga line).

So train_position rating:e would bring up all of the former, and train_position rating:s would bring up the latter.

KloH0und said:
This was actually going to be another discussion for me to bring up:

I propose we use train_position not only to refer to describe the sexual position, but also to refer to a group of people arranged in a line with non-sexual physical contact between the individuals (e.g. a conga line).

So train_position rating:e would bring up all of the former, and train_position rating:s would bring up the latter.

Why not just use Conga_line?

We can implicate train_position with conga_line.

A Conga line forms a train of people, but people can be in a train position without Conga... ing.