canine_penis -> anatomically_correct_penis
feline_penis -> anatomically_correct_penis
horsecock -> anatomically_correct_penis
(etc)

canine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy
equine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy
(etc)

anatomically_correct_penis -> anatomically_correct
anatomically_correct_pussy -> anatomically_correct

It has been mentioned that there is a desire from the userbase to have an easy way to search for non-human genitalia, and this is my proposed solution to this issue.

Obviously a lot of tagging will have to be done to make the solution complete, but a lot of tagging must always be done.

Thoughts? Concerns? Suggestions?

guiness_the_horse_cocked_wolf says that just because a penis is equine does not necessarily mean it's attached to an equine and therefore is not necessarily anatomically_correct.

Test-Subject_217601 said:
guiness_the_horse_cocked_wolf says that just because a penis is equine does not necessarily mean it's attached to an equine and therefore is not necessarily anatomically_correct.

Yea, I know, that was my debate also which is why I wanted a non_human_penis or animal_penis tag but hey... what can you do right? Test-Subject, I thought we'd never agree on this matter lol!

All I really want is a tag to differentiate between human and non human penis lol, to me non_human_penis seems straight fowards but I'm not an admin so I can't make that call, I can only suggest it.

Here's what we know:

We need a tag to describe genitalia that's not humanlike. This could either be used only on genitalia that exist naturally, or also fantasy ones like dragons and such. Current possibilities are animal_genitalia and anatomically_correct.

We also need to figure out if we should differentiate between matching genitalia and species, or no. In other words, do we use the tag on a wolf with horse genitalia? Do we have two different tags, one when it's on the correct animal and one regardless?

We need some common tags to refer to specific common types of genitalia. Right now we use canine_penis, feline_pussy, etc. This is unlikely to change.

We need two umbrella tags, one for female genitalia and one for male genitalia, and one final umbrella tag to tie it all together. Or do we? Do we really need three umbrella tags?

Test-Subject_217601 said:
guiness_the_horse_cocked_wolf says that just because a penis is equine does not necessarily mean it's attached to an equine and therefore is not necessarily anatomically_correct.

Oh well, people will either look over the tag or just delete the few that aren't "anatomically correct" I agree, so when you implicate it, will it automatically add this to all implicated tags or only tags from now on?

Anatomically_correct_penis or like tony said animal_penis are both fine.

I typed in penis -balls and a picture of a penis WITH balls appeared, should I add balls to this picture so that it will be more accurate?

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
I typed in penis -balls and a picture of a penis WITH balls appeared, should I add balls to this picture so that it will be more accurate?

Yes.

null0010 said:
Yes.

So is X_penis going to be implemented to anatomically_correct_penis?

X is any animal that can be put before penis such as dragon, elephant, gorilla, dog, feline, equuis and ect. And as far as the animal hybrids, they are literately so damn rare that I wouldn't worry about it unless you wanted to implement it to animal_penis or non_human_penis. I'm truly fine with any of these 3 options but there does need a way to separate humanoid and animal penises.

Depends on the outcome of this discussion.

PEOPLE? Can we please agree on a tag that separates the humanoid penises from the animal penises? The tag needs these qualifications

Easy to understand
Easy to type and remember
No GAPING technicalities in the tag
No puns
Right to the point

Upon using this site for a week I think that "animalcock" is the best way to go. Just like horsecock.

Human penis has always been the default. The vast majority of users who type the word will be looking for that unless they specify otherwise. I see no reason to fix what isn't broke. Why make the site harder to use? You're gonna see human dong "ifaptopigballs guy", because this is a furry site, not a zoo one.

i still dont see the point of anatomically_correct_penis/pussy

we have anatomically_correct and we have penis and we have pussy. hell we even have shit like feline_penis and canine_pussy.

We don't allow long_[color]_hair and we shouldn't allow anatomically_correct_[bits]

So how about
horsecock -> anatomically_correct
canine_penis -> anatomically_correct
canine_pussy -> anatomically_correct
feline_penis -> anatomically_correct
equine_pussy -> anatomically_correct

I believe a tag should be added for animals that match, like this. You have a wolf, with a anatomically correct member, the picture is given the tags: anatomically_correct (it's a wolf with a wolf's member), canine_penis (is is after all), and then animal_genitalia (pretty much self explanatory). This way, people can search for JUST the wolf with an anatomically correct junk, or they can search for the umbrella term. It's broad and covers all aspects people are looking for.

Ratty said:
ifaptopigballs guy

Really? Doesn't everyone on this site fap to some animal part?

Also, my point is, there are SOOO many tags for every specific animal's penis for people who want to see that animals penis and not a humans, these tags already exist so I'm not creating something new here. So why not implicate canine_penis, feline_penis, horsecock ect to ONE tag for those people who want to only see animal penises but doesn't have an exact preference? It makes good since to me.

animalcock

AlphaWolf75 said:
I believe a tag should be added for animals that match, like this. You have a wolf, with a anatomically correct member, the picture is given the tags: anatomically_correct (it's a wolf with a wolf's member), canine_penis (is is after all), and then animal_genitalia (pretty much self explanatory). This way, people can search for JUST the wolf with an anatomically correct junk, or they can search for the umbrella term. It's broad and covers all aspects people are looking for.

because animal_genitalia is literally the same as anatomically_correct

Ratty said:
"ifaptopigballs guy"

not okay

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
Really? Doesn't everyone on this site fap to some animal part?

Also, my point is, there are SOOO many tags for every specific animal's penis for people who want to see that animals penis and not a humans, these tags already exist so I'm not creating something new here. So why not implicate canine_penis, feline_penis, horsecock ect to ONE tag for those people who want to only see animal penises but doesn't have an exact preference? It makes good since to me.

animalcock

It's not the big picture, it's when the sun sets on a post so you can see shades of Barbados.

ippiki_ookami said:
not okay

I suppose I should have called him on being creepily explicit and giving TMI in that thread, and he's new so perhaps hadn't read the rules, so you have a point I guess. Just came out because the suggestion of labeling human_penis instead of having it as the default seems unreasonable to me. Instead of making the site less convenient for the majority of users couldn't he just search for a lot of animal penis tags at once?

ippiki_ookami said:
because animal_genitalia is literally the same as anatomically_correct

ippiki ookami, currently people ONLY use the tag anatomically_correct to draw actual animals exactly how they appear in nature. I think that we should keep it that way because it's good to look at an ACTUAL wolf once in a while or an ACTUAL horse. And if we implicated it to anatomically_correct then those pictures would be lost in the chaos. There will be no way to search between furries and animals anymore.

So that's why I was asking for a tag like animalcock to specify that it's a penis that looks like an animal and not a human REGARDLESS on what type of body it's attached to.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
ippiki ookami, currently people ONLY use the tag anatomically_correct to draw actual animals exactly how they appear in nature. I think that we should keep it that way because it's good to look at an ACTUAL wolf once in a while or an ACTUAL horse. And if we implicated it anatomically_correct then those pictures would be lost in the chaos.

So that's why I was asking for a tag like animalcock to specify that it's a penis that looks like an animal and not a human

That seems a lot more reasonable than changing the default penis tag, just making all horse_cock etc. tags implicate animalcock or something.

Ratty said:
That seems a lot more reasonable than changing the default penis tag, just making all horse_cock etc. tags implicate animalcock or something.

The main argument is that anatomically_correct_penis won't work because people are sticking horse penises on tigers and lions.

Anatomically_correct means animalcock EXCEPT then all 288 of the drawings of animals who are literately anatomically_correct (not even counting the not tagged ones) will be lost in the flood of the other pictures.

Best solution is to make a tag called animalcock because it's a fact, I read comments all the time that people like to see animalcocks vs human penises in drawings.

why not solve everything by adding human_penis to things with a human penis. then you could search -human_penis or blacklist human_penis. everybody wins.

Finny_Nettle said:
why not solve everything by adding human_penis to things with a human penis. then you could search -human_penis or blacklist human_penis. everybody wins.

WHAT? THAT'S STUPID! If we were going to ADD a tag and have to hand tag EVERY SINGLE PICTURE with it... it would be far less trouble to just IMPLICATE the already done tags to animalcock you IDIOT!

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
WHAT? THAT'S STUPID! If we were going to ADD a tag and have to hand tag EVERY SINGLE PICTURE with it... it would be far less trouble to just IMPLICATE the already done tags to animalcock you IDIOT!

says the same guy who wanted to add true_penis to everything. calm down, it was just a suggestion, no need to get snippy.

Wow, this is really starting to get out of hands.

Brightwater said:
Wow, this is really starting to get out of hands.

Well only furries take animal penises this seriously :D

CamKitty said:
Well only furries take animal penises this seriously :D

I'm a true furry AND beasti by every definion, so I like to see furries with animal penises and I already stated how anatomically_correct has MAJOR flaws so it's as simple as implicating animalcock to all [animal]_penis tags.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
WHAT? THAT'S STUPID! If we were going to ADD a tag and have to hand tag EVERY SINGLE PICTURE with it... it would be far less trouble to just IMPLICATE the already done tags to animalcock you IDIOT!

Dude that was super uncalled for.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
WHAT? THAT'S STUPID! If we were going to ADD a tag and have to hand tag EVERY SINGLE PICTURE with it... it would be far less trouble to just IMPLICATE the already done tags to animalcock you IDIOT!

I THINK YOU COULD USE A LITTLE MORE CAPSLOCK

BECAUSE THAT MAKES WHAT YOU SAY IMPORTANT BECAUSE PLEBIANS GET ANNOYED AT IT

ippiki_ookami said:
Dude that was super uncalled for.

Well sorry ookami but people talk to ME like that all the time and call me names and no admin has corrected them (except today when you corrected that guy who said something wrong to me) but other than that, people spill words left and right.

I'd like to start seeing a little more discussion about the topic at hand and a little less shit-slinging.

tony311 said:
I'd like to start seeing a little more discussion about the topic at hand and a little less shit-slinging.

Thank you, I would like to discuss the TOPIC but other people go on rants about why my ideas are stupid and bla bla bla even though I made good valid points, so since it got lost, I'll say it again.

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
The main argument is that anatomically_correct_penis won't work because people are sticking horse penises on tigers and lions.

Anatomically_correct means animalcock EXCEPT then all 288 of the drawings of animals who are literately anatomically_correct (not even counting the not tagged ones) will be lost in the flood of the other pictures.

Best solution is to make a tag called animalcock because it's a fact, I read comments all the time that people like to see animalcocks vs human penises in drawings.

null0010 said:
canine_penis -> anatomically_correct_penis
feline_penis -> anatomically_correct_penis
horsecock -> anatomically_correct_penis
(etc)

canine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy
equine_pussy -> anatomically_correct_pussy
(etc)

anatomically_correct_penis -> anatomically_correct
anatomically_correct_pussy -> anatomically_correct

It has been mentioned that there is a desire from the userbase to have an easy way to search for non-human genitalia, and this is my proposed solution to this issue.

Obviously a lot of tagging will have to be done to make the solution complete, but a lot of tagging must always be done.

Thoughts? Concerns? Suggestions?

I think this is a great suggestion, because as a furry standpoint canine/feline/horse/bovine are all anatomically correct for the species they portray.

I can get behind an animal_genitals tag. It will be useful for situations like
post #172696
and
post #165785
since tagging a rabbit or a cat that has a horse dick anatomically_correct would be inaccurate.

+1 to animal_genitals as well due to it being more context-fitting than anatomically_correct

Does this mean the following would be implicated?

canine_penis -> animal_genitals
feline_penis -> animal_genitals
horsecock -> animal_genitals
(etc)

canine_pussy -> animal_genitals
equine_pussy -> animal_genitals
(etc)

anatomically_correct_penis -> animal_genitals
anatomically_correct_pussy -> animal_genitals

ippiki_ookami said:
I can get behind an animal_genitals tag.

#1 - Isn't anatomically_correct_penis a lot to type in?

#2 - Regardless of what tag means "animalcock" PLEASE, PLEASE don't alias or implicate anatomically_correct to anatomically_correct_penis because anatomically_correct has 228 pictures of animals who are literately anatomically_correct as in physical bone structure which is what anatomically_correct literately means. Where will they go then, blended in with the actual furries.

I am willing to settle for anatomically_correct_penis/pussy if the admins are that adamant on it but could we please leave anatomically_correct how it is?

Nvm, found the thread, yo:

'kay, how 'bout this:

"If it looks like a real horse cawk, it should tagged with a tag that infers or recognizes the correctly rendered hors cawk. Same with reptile pussies. Same with avian vagoos: tag it right; tag wtf u see."

Query: would a HYPER canine dick be considered anatomatically correct, tagging-wise?

If its indeed anatomically correct then anatomically correct works
If it has a human penis then a label of human penis works
If its an animal with clearly another animals genitals I propose something along the lines of hybrid, hybrid genitalia or animal genitalia/animal penis.

Just my thought on the matter. Simplicity should try to be maintained while still covering all bases.

titaniachkt said:
+1 to animal_genitals as well due to it being more context-fitting than anatomically_correct

Does this mean the following would be implicated?

canine_penis -> animal_genitals
feline_penis -> animal_genitals
horsecock -> animal_genitals
(etc)

canine_pussy -> animal_genitals
equine_pussy -> animal_genitals
(etc)

anatomically_correct_penis -> animal_genitals
anatomically_correct_pussy -> animal_genitals

yes to all of the above. And don't forget about
anatomically_correct -> animal_genitals

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
#1 - Isn't anatomically_correct_penis a lot to type in?

#2 - Regardless of what tag means "animalcock" PLEASE, PLEASE don't alias or implicate anatomically_correct to anatomically_correct_penis because anatomically_correct has 228 pictures of animals who are literately anatomically_correct as in physical bone structure which is what anatomically_correct literately means. Where will they go then, blended in with the actual furries.

I am willing to settle for anatomically_correct_penis/pussy if the admins are that adamant on it but could we please leave anatomically_correct how it is?

We will not be using anatomically_correct_penis/pussy. Period. And once again, anatomically_correct ONLY refers to the genitalia of the character, not bone structure.

Lyokira said:
Query: would a HYPER canine dick be considered anatomatically correct, tagging-wise?

uuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhh

But animal_genitals refers to male AND female. Can there just DAMN be something that refers ONLY to a males animal penis without saying something that most people can't even spell. Plus there is obviously lost of controversy over anatomically_correct

Animal_genitals is fine, I get that but whats wrong with ALSO having

Animal_penis -> animal_genitals

Animal_pussy -> animal_genitals

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
But animal_genitals refers to male AND female. Can there just DAMN be something that refers ONLY to a males animal penis..

You can try
*_penis
or
*_pussy

xxxFurryFanxxx said:
But animal_genitals refers to male AND female. Can there just DAMN be something that refers ONLY to a males animal penis without saying something that most people can't even spell.

Search "animal_genitals penis", problem solved.

And who in the hell can't spell "genitals"?

Test-Subject_217601 said:
Search "animal_genitals penis", problem solved.

Except not really. You might get an animal pussy and a human penis.

Test-Subject_217601 said:
Search "animal_genitals penis", problem solved.

And who in the hell can't spell "genitals"?

retards

Lyokira said:
Query: would a HYPER canine dick be considered anatomatically correct, tagging-wise?

ippiki_ookami said:
uuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhh

That's not a very helpful comment. But I did meant that seriously; I would consider body proportions to be part of being anatomically correct.

Lyokira said:
That's not a very helpful comment. But I did meant that seriously; I would consider body proportions to be part of being anatomically correct.

Well sorry, but I have no idea. I would say........yes?

Test-Subject_217601 said:
Search "animal_genitals penis", problem solved.

And who in the hell can't spell "genitals"?

Snowy said:
Except not really. You might get an animal pussy and a human penis.

I agree, the best solution is to just have animal_penis, animal_pussy and for argument sake, have them aliased to animal_genitals

xXxSnowLeopardxXx said:
I agree, the best solution is to just have animal_penis, animal_pussy and for argument sake, have them aliased to animal_genitals

If both of those tags were aliased to animal_genitals, there would be absolutely no reason whatsoever to use either the animal_penis or animal_pussy tags at all.

null0010 said:
If both of those tags were aliased to animal_genitals, there would be absolutely no reason whatsoever to use either the animal_penis or animal_pussy tags at all.

Oops, I mean Implicated!

Have animal_penis and animal_pussy separate but they would both be implicated to animal_genitals

But only if there was a way so that when you type in animal_genitals then penis/pussy doesn't pop up also. Like that.

But really that wouldn't be necessary because in general, people don't type in genitalia that vaguely, normally they want either penis or pussy... not including dickgirl and cuntboy.