Implicating katia_managan -> prequel.

Reason: Prequel character

While we're at it:

quill-weave - > prequel
nah - > prequel
asotil - > prequel

KloH0und said:
While we're at it:

quill-weave - > prequel
nah - > prequel
asotil - > prequel

Shouldn't imply QW, she's actually in Oblivion.

Ah, good catch.

Perhaps quill-weave could imply both Prequel and Oblivion?

Or have it imply Prequel only when the katia_managan tag is also present?

Mechaniatrix said:
Perhaps quill-weave could imply both Prequel and Oblivion?

What about the images that are clearly prequel-specific?

Mechaniatrix said:
Or have it imply Prequel only when the katia_managan tag is also present?

Sadly, implications do not work that way.

null0010 said:
What about the images that are clearly prequel-specific?

Clearly we could just...
...we could...
Dammit null you're right.

null0010 said:
Sadly, implications do not work that way.

Any chance of getting that implemented? That would solve most of the bitching problems on the site that are related to tags.

Mechaniatrix said:
Or have it imply Prequel only when the katia_managan tag is also present?

1) As mentioned, implications do not work that way.
2) Implications do not need to work that way. If the katia_managan tag is present, the prequel tag will be present, because of the katia_managan -> prequel implication.

Mechaniatrix said:
Any chance of getting that implemented? That would solve most of the bitching problems on the site that are related to tags.

That's Aurali's department.

What if you guys just add the Prequel tag where the image was clearly relating to Prequel? Messing about with the implication set-up isn't needed and will most likely cause many a day's downtime for the implications.