Topic: for god's sake tag gender

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

it's fucking trivial
male or female or herm or ambiguous or whatever
just something

and then you will never ever have to look at cocks again if you don't want to

Updated by SpanKing

Bit of a paradox really, You'd have to see the cocks to tag them, but at least you'd have the satisfaction of having things properly tagged and never having to see those particular cocks again unless you want to. ;)

Updated by anonymous

cannibalkitteh said:
Bit of a paradox really, You'd have to see the cocks to tag them, but at least you'd have the satisfaction of having things properly tagged and never having to see those particular cocks again unless you want to. ;)

theoretically if you're uploading the pic and you dont want to see cocks, well... it probably has no cocks

but if everyone would just tag gender, then my -female filter would actually work, and these guys's -male filters would work, and the comments field wouldn't be for "EW FAGS NEEDSMOARTITS" like 102% of the time

Updated by anonymous

Enoch-Fox said:
it's fucking trivial
male or female or herm or ambiguous or whatever
just something

and then you will never ever have to look at cocks again if you don't want to

well only if it's a single sex and solo, because otherwise if you blacklist male, you'll get all the solo male stuff out, but you might lose some of the straight sex stuff regardless of whether it's tagged correctly or not. so basically:

M = male
F = female
H = Herm
M/M = gay
F/F = lesbian
M/F = straight

that would make the filter work 100%. (obviously I don't mean tag it with single letters, I was using that as short hand.)

Updated by anonymous

it doesnt matter when people upload like 100 mermaids with their titties out flopping everywhere

damn i hate all them titties
especially tittyfish titties

Updated by anonymous

ktkr

Former Staff

Enoch-Fox said:
it doesnt matter when people upload like 100 mermaids with their titties out flopping everywhere

damn i hate all them titties
especially tittyfish titties

1K GET!

Updated by anonymous

therabbidwanker said:
well only if it's a single sex and solo, because otherwise if you blacklist male, you'll get all the solo male stuff out, but you might lose some of the straight sex stuff regardless of whether it's tagged correctly or not. so basically:

M = male
F = female
H = Herm
M/M = gay
F/F = lesbian
M/F = straight

that would make the filter work 100%. (obviously I don't mean tag it with single letters, I was using that as short hand.)

You forget the H/M H/H H/F permutation pairing. In addition there are F/F/M, F/F/H, H/H/F, H/H/M, F/H/M, and the permutations just go on from there. I'm still likely missing more that I haven't thought of.

Updated by anonymous

VulpesFoxnik said:
You forget the H/M H/H H/F permutation pairing. In addition there are F/F/M, F/F/H, H/H/F, H/H/M, F/H/M, and the permutations just go on from there. I'm still likely missing more that I haven't thought of.

I think at the point people are going into threesomes, or herm pairings, you start getting primarily into groups of people who don't care.

If you like herm, what are the odds that you absolutely hate H/H or H/M or H/F? But heck, if it did bother you enough that you blacklist female and/or male, it would stop those pairings from showing up

If you like gay, what are the odds you aren't going to like M/M/M?

If you don't like to see cock, and have male and herm blocked, and it's tagged correctly, it should catch all stop F/F/M M/M/F F/F/H etc.

As long as the 6 basic tags that terabbidwanker listed are applied correctly, and people actually blacklist what they don't want to see, I should imagine it would be rare, if ever, that an image comes up in the category someone doesn't want to see (unless the image simply wasn't tagged)

Updated by anonymous

it doesnt matter because nobody tags gender at all
ever
no people do this
my posts screen is constantly flooded with boobies

Updated by anonymous

Enoch-Fox said:
it doesnt matter because nobody tags gender at all
ever
no people do this
my posts screen is constantly flooded with boobies

Tag 'em when you come across them and you'll never have to see them again. ;)

Updated by anonymous

cannibalkitteh said:
Tag 'em when you come across them and you'll never have to see them again. ;)

I have been. It's a pain. Also I shouldn't have to blacklist "PROLAPSE" to avoid seeing awful inverted vaginas... how the hell does someone put a tag as specific as PROLAPSE and forget oh hey this is an womans.

Updated by anonymous

Enoch-Fox said:
it doesnt matter because nobody tags gender at all
ever
no people do this
my posts screen is constantly flooded with boobies

female 15705
male 14355
straight 4425
gay 3968
intersex 1412
lesbian 917

OH REALLY? (And that's not even up to date numbers) It may not be every post, but it sure is a lot of them that are getting tagged.

Also:
pussy 5563
breasts 7575

If you have intersex, pussy, breasts, and female blacklisted, that should kill virtually all the "boobies" that you hate so much.

Updated by anonymous

Marbles said:
If you have intersex, pussy, breasts, and female blacklisted, that should kill virtually all the "boobies" that you hate so much.

no
do this search
-male -female -herm -ambiguous_gender
that isn't "virtually" zero posts by any stretch so
enjoy being wrong

additionally don't get sassy with me colonel sassacre
it's just stunning when my screen is full of distended cow udder/vag/anus overflow

Updated by anonymous

As much as I support correct tagging...
What the hell, how bad of a boner killer can it be looking at a couple of boobs for a split second twice a week? Usually, people who add tags like prolapse obviously consider every aspect of the image, so you've run into what, 4 prolapses? I hope you'll be able to live a normal life after that.

I do however think that the "submit" page should include some kind of tagging guide showing a list of the most important tagging categories like gender, species, pose, etc. I know there's a wiki entry for that but very few people have the habit of looking at it first.

Updated by anonymous

There is a tagging checklist. I believe few items from the checklist are necessary, but no one cares :)

Updated by anonymous

Jazz said:
There is a tagging checklist. I believe few items from the checklist are necessary, but no one cares :)

I know, but it should go a little further than that. An option would be additional columns next to "my tags" (in case you have any). The 2. column being "gender" with its options below it, the next column "colour" or whatever. This way, the tags would be clickable and it's easier to check if you forgot something.
That would really speed up the tagging process for everyone

Updated by anonymous

Not all images can be tagged with gender tag

Still if there will be option button, we'll find images with wrong gender

Updated by anonymous

Enoch-Fox said:
no
do this search
-male -female -herm -ambiguous_gender
that isn't "virtually" zero posts by any stretch so
enjoy being wrong

*sigh* Okay let's run an experiment. I'll search for...

"-male -female -herm" and go through 10 pages... AKA 200 images... and the tally comes up to

3 penises that were tagged "penis"
11 breasts that were tagged "breasts"
1 vagina tagged "vagina"

2 untagged breasts (both of which were clothed)

If you actually blacklisted what you don't want to see, you would have seen a grand total of 2 clothed females 200 images. AKA it successfully blocked 99% of what you don't want to see.

Wow, the blacklisting system is REALLY broken, I mean, it only has 99% accuracy! That's pretty terrible! /sarcasm

Updated by anonymous

Marbles said:
*sigh* Okay let's run an experiment. I'll search for...

"-male -female -herm" and go through 10 pages... AKA 200 images... and the tally comes up to

3 penises that were tagged "penis"
11 breasts that were tagged "breasts"
1 vagina tagged "vagina"

2 untagged breasts (both of which were clothed)

If you actually blacklisted what you don't want to see, you would have seen a grand total of 2 clothed females 200 images. AKA it successfully blocked 99% of what you don't want to see.

Wow, the blacklisting system is REALLY broken, I mean, it only has 99% accuracy! That's pretty terrible! /sarcasm

You might want to use "intersex" instead since it encompasses dickgirls and cuntboys. Herm only covers a special case of Intersex.

And Ambigous sex means the sex cannot be determined from the image. Neuter means they have no sex organs. Read the wiki sometime.

Updated by anonymous

VulpesFoxnik said:
You might want to use "intersex" instead since it encompasses dickgirls and cuntboys. Herm only covers a special case of Intersex. And Ambigous sex means the sex cannot be determined from the image. Neuter means they have no sex organs. Read the wiki sometime.

I know what intersex, ambiguous, and neuter mean. I was doing a quick search for the sake of the argument.

Like I said in my post, even with those three terms, I managed to only find two pictures which were untagged. Both of which were clothed females, in completely non-erotic pictures. If seeing a non-erotic clothed female is so detrimental to you, I'm sorry.

Point is, if you hate penis, you can blacklist "male, penis, intersex, gay" and you won't get penis. For the same thing, if you hate vagina, you can put down "female, vagina" If you hate breasts, you can put down "female, breasts, herm" Etc.

Whatever you need to get rid of what you need, the filter appears to be working with a very high rate of accuracy.

...

Enoch-Fox needs to stop being a crybaby, go to this page...

http://e621.net/user/edit

And add to the blacklist "female vagina breasts prolapse"

Updated by anonymous

VulpesFoxnik said:
You might want to use "intersex" instead since it encompasses dickgirls and cuntboys. Herm only covers a special case of Intersex.

And Ambigous sex means the sex cannot be determined from the image. Neuter means they have no sex organs. Read the wiki sometime.

Why don't you read the wiki and notice that I wrote the Ambiguous_Gender page you're referencing. Also, way to use the term "sexually dimorphic" to define "sex-identifying". I'm sure that that will clarify things for a lot of people. I put it back because the wiki is for people to understand what a tag means, and an example is worth much more than your high-falutin' college words.

Marbles said:
*sigh* Okay let's run an experiment. I'll search for...

"-male -female -herm" and go through 10 pages... AKA 200 images... and the tally comes up to

3 penises that were tagged "penis"
11 breasts that were tagged "breasts"
1 vagina tagged "vagina"

2 untagged breasts (both of which were clothed)

If you actually blacklisted what you don't want to see, you would have seen a grand total of 2 clothed females 200 images. AKA it successfully blocked 99% of what you don't want to see.

Wow, the blacklisting system is REALLY broken, I mean, it only has 99% accuracy! That's pretty terrible! /sarcasm

Wow, since you're a solidly stupendous douchebag about things, Marbles, lemme do my own experiment where you pay half a fucking gram of attention to anything

ever

and you think for a second "why would this guy complain about tagging if he isn't using the blacklist?" and notice that I AM using it and all that stuff is on it (I'll post it below for you just so's you know) AND JUST AS you're about to perform your search, you notice that I fury-tagged like 12 pages of posts with the proper genders shortly after my last post in this thread AND you think that maybe your search maybe just maybe maybe a little teeny tiny bit might have benefited from me helping clean up the awful miserable mess that a few shitty posters made)... and for the record
here is my list (no they aren't all on one line in the blacklist, I just did that to save space here)

female catgirl straight lesbian guro gore blood vore what breasts pussy loli scat herm vagina catgirl pussy vaginal_intercourse fæces

it's been that way forever
i might have to add prolapse now

SpanKing said:
As much as I support correct tagging...
What the hell, how bad of a boner killer can it be looking at a couple of boobs for a split second twice a week? Usually, people who add tags like prolapse obviously consider every aspect of the image, so you've run into what, 4 prolapses? I hope you'll be able to live a normal life after that.

I do however think that the "submit" page should include some kind of tagging guide showing a list of the most important tagging categories like gender, species, pose, etc. I know there's a wiki entry for that but very few people have the habit of looking at it first.

OKAY clearly I should have made this thread about not wanting to see dicks or SL screenshots or whatever else it is that you all hate

you're missing the point

the tagging system is why sites like this are good
if it doesn't work like it's supposed to due to shitty posters, then we may as well just keep every image in a fucking folder

christ's sakes people, it's not the titties
it's the principle of the thing

Updated by anonymous

okay regardless this thread
it doesn't do anything
people who make shitty posts don't check the forums like HEY I WONDER IF I SHOULD PUT ANY TAG EXCEPT MY OWN NAME ON THIS

pff nvm guys

Updated by anonymous

Enoch-Fox said:
okay regardless this thread
it doesn't do anything
people who make shitty posts don't check the forums like HEY I WONDER IF I SHOULD PUT ANY TAG EXCEPT MY OWN NAME ON THIS

exactly

Jazz said:
Not all images can be tagged with gender tag

Still if there will be option button, we'll find images with wrong gender

It doesn't have to be made mandatory. A list like the one below "my tags" on the submit-page should do just fine.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1