We don't need the aftermath tag, when after_sex seems to be the more logical term.

The aftermath tag is basically a second tier; a distinctly messier and more impressive state. Cases such as post-gangbang and such.

By contrast, after_sex means exactly that and nothing more, thus encompassing both what falls under aftermath as well as milder scenarios such as individual couples after a single go.

We already have a messy tag, though.

Hm. After checking the tags, it looks like that's not how people have been using the aftermath tag anyways. :/

*Shrug*

A lot of people make up tags, and now they need to be cleaned up.

I agree that this would be a good implication to add.

acct0283476 said:
The aftermath tag is basically a second tier; a distinctly messier and more impressive state. Cases such as post-gangbang and such.

By contrast, after_sex means exactly that and nothing more, thus encompassing both what falls under aftermath as well as milder scenarios such as individual couples after a single go.

Too many tags describing the "levels" of scenarios just gets confusing. It only leads to incorrect tagging as most people won't know the difference unless they look at a wiki page, if there even is one that describes such differences.

Those two tags don't have a wiki page, so I wouldn't have even known there was a difference, or that there was an aftermath tag to begin with until I looked at this topic.

Yeah, there really isn't a "level" when it comes to a picture depicting the after effects of sex.

Agreed with the above, in general. Too many levels gets confusing. how are people supposed to know what one word or another means? Aftermath would just confuse me :D ((then again, I sheepishly admit it took me a few weeks to 'get' what the 'bottomless' tag meant...))