reason: post #149627 would be a good example of absurd res, while post #149065 would be a good example of hi res
Updated by Snowy
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
reason: post #149627 would be a good example of absurd res, while post #149065 would be a good example of hi res
Updated by Snowy
I personally think absurd_res should imply hi_res. 'Cos generally when something's huge, it's probably high res.
Updated by anonymous
ExplosiveBlaziken said:
I personally think absurd_res should imply hi_res. 'Cos generally when something's huge, it's probably high res.
i get what your saying, but to me absurd res is when the res is so high it takes so long to load
Updated by anonymous
So are you saying they should be separate tags? What's the size difference between high and absurd?
Updated by anonymous
ippiki_ookami said:
So are you saying they should be separate tags?
yes i am
Updated by anonymous
.......
I'm confused.
The following are a list of things that are ALIASED to hi_res:
hi-res
high_res
high_resolution
highres
hires
Absurd_res is the only thing that IMPLIES hi_res
While it's possible for someone to be so fat they are not chubby, there is no upper limit to when "hi res" suddenly is not hi_res any longer. Only a lower limit.
Updated by anonymous
SnowWolf said:
.......I'm confused.
The following are a list of things that are ALIASED to hi_res:
- hi-res
hi-res
high_res
high_resolution
highres
hiresAbsurd_res is the only thing that IMPLIES hi_res
While it's possible for someone to be so fat they are not chubby, there is no upper limit to when "hi res" suddenly is not hi_res any longer. Only a lower limit.
you get what im saying though right?
Updated by anonymous
0904255 said:
you get what im saying though right?
No.. I don't think I do.
Updated by anonymous
0904255 said:
i get what your saying, but to me absurd res is when the res is so high it takes so long to load
I agree, a good absurd res makes you feel like it's 1998 all over again.
Updated by anonymous
0904255 said:
you get what im saying though right?
That if an image's resolution is high enough, it's no longer high resolution? Because that's what you seem to be saying.
What we have at the moment is an implication. If an image is tagged absurd_res, it ends up with the tags absurd_res and hi_res. This makes perfect sense, because if the resolution is so high it takes a very long time to load, it's clearly a high resolution image. If you'd like to find hi_res images that aren't absurd_res, you can always search hi_res -absurd_res. If you'd like to find absurd_res images, just search absurd_res. The implication doesn't matter at all for that.
Updated by anonymous