NotMeNotYou said:
People under 18 are banned because of the local laws where the server, and Bad-Dragon, are located.
Some people don't want to jeopardize their living with something that basic.

Whatever the reason, it's a form of censorship.

Ozelot said:
Whatever the reason, it's a form of censorship.

That's not censorship you muppet the art gets posted in the site banning under age peope to browsing the site doesn't mean anything to the content that gets posted on the site, please take your facistic ass back to tumblr.

Ozelot said:
Whatever the reason, it's a form of censorship.

There is a difference between censorship, and limited posting.

Not allowing human porn on this site is not censorship, it's limited posting. This site is meant for a certain type of content, for furry porn. So when you delete human porn it's not censorship.

Now if you deleted a certain furry artist porn, just because fuck it you don't like them. that might be considered censorship. But if a site is dedicated to posting only images of trains, and you post a picture of a fighter-jet. And it gets taken down... You can't cry "censorrrrrshippp"

Not allowing a 14 year old on a porn site? That's not censorship, that's the law.

Cynosure said:
There is a difference between censorship, and limited posting.

Not allowing human porn on this site is not censorship, it's limited posting. This site is meant for a certain type of content, for furry porn. So when you delete human porn it's not censorship.

Now if you deleted a certain furry artist porn, just because fuck it you don't like them. that might be considered censorship. But if a site is dedicated to posting only images of trains, and you post a picture of a fighter-jet. And it gets taken down... You can't cry "censorrrrrshippp"

Not allowing a 14 year old on a porn site? That's not censorship, that's the law.

Okay then, I guess Tumblr is using "limited posting" as you like to call it.

RioluKid said:
That's not censorship you muppet the art gets posted in the site banning under age peope to browsing the site doesn't mean anything to the content that gets posted on the site, please take your facistic ass back to tumblr.

You're really angry about this, aren't you?

Ozelot said:
You're really angry about this, aren't you?

Yeah fascistic drama queen assholes like yourself really piss me off

RioluKid said:
Yeah fascistic drama queen assholes like yourself really piss me off

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b6/71/3a/b6713a00bfe38efc6be16c2776c80b47.jpg

Whelp. Creating that record reminded me why I hate making those on my phone.

Ozelot said:
Okay then, I guess Tumblr is using "limited posting" as you like to call it.

I don't know whats going on with tumblr in this case, I don't really care because I don't know the artist. But you were saying that this site uses censorship by not allowing human porn and not allowing underage viewers? lol no. That's not censorship.

I'm not talking about "doxy" I'm just saying, E6 is not censoring anyone by not allowing human porn or underage viewers.

Cynosure said:
I don't know whats going on with tumblr in this case, I don't really care because I don't know the artist. But you were saying that this site uses censorship by not allowing human porn and not allowing underage viewers? lol no. That's not censorship.

I'm not talking about "doxy" I'm just saying, E6 is not censoring anyone by not allowing human porn or underage viewers.

Whatever you want to call it, it is a limitation on who can speak here and what they can speak about. This is proof that unlimited free speech doesn't exist here either.

Using the "violatin' muh free speech" argument doesn't mean anything on the internet, where you have no guarantee of it.

Ozelot said:
Whatever you want to call it, it is a limitation on who can speak here and what they can speak about. This is proof that unlimited free speech doesn't exist here either.

Dude, as it was already said, it isn't censoring. It's just the focus of the site. Again, as it was previously said, you wouldn't post a fighter jet on a train centered site (sure, there may be someone that who is interested, but still). Pretty much like you're not going to a funeral with casual or colorful clothes (unless the deceased wished it to be so, of course).

As it has always been on this site: e621's main focus is furry artwork, with the occasional NSFW posts. Due to that, and by California's laws, any person below the age of 18 should not create an account per the site's terms of use.

Note that I said "should not", because there's nothing that can stop kids from browsing or creating an account on this site (besides parents).

Edit: In case you want to whine as to why did I cut part of your reply, it was'nt because "censoring", but because it wasn't relevant to my reply

Xch3l said:
Dude, as it was already said, it isn't censoring. It's just the focus of the site. Again, as it was previously said, you wouldn't post a fighter jet on a train centered site (sure, there may be someone that who is interested, but still). Pretty much like you're not going to a funeral with casual or colorful clothes (unless the deceased wished it to be so, of course).

As it has always been on this site: e621's main focus is furry artwork, with the occasional NSFW posts. Due to that, and by California's laws, any person below the age of 18 should not create an account per the site's terms of use.

Note that I said "should not", because there's nothing that can stop kids from browsing or creating an account on this site (besides parents).

Edit: In case you want to whine as to why did I cut part of your reply, it was'nt because "censoring", but because it wasn't relevant to my reply

So you agree that even here you don't have unlimited free speech. Good.

Whether you call it censoring or not is an irrelevant semantic argument.

Ozelot said:
So you agree that even here you don't have unlimited free speech. Good.

The fuck!? I never said such thing. If I did, according to your understanding, show me an extract of my text and prove it.

Whether you call it censoring or not is an irrelevant semantic argument.

Uh-huh. So now "censoring" is an irrelevant semantic argument. When you seemingly defended it few posts ago.

As much as I love arguing semantics, this thread has long outlived its purpose.

Thread censorlocked.