nintendo and etc created by alithographica
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Bricktor said:
    Sorry for the lack of tags, I wasn't really sure how to tag it :(

    You did enough. The minimum is 4. You really dont have to apologize about something you did right.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Bricktor said:
    Sorry for the lack of tags, I wasn't really sure how to tag it :(

    Only problem I could see was the presence of the Persian tag. Just like with mega forms, we don't tag the base form on alolan pokemon.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Only problem I could see was the presence of the Persian tag. Just like with mega forms, we don't tag the base form on alolan pokemon.

    Can I ask why that is? If I was searching for a Pokemon, I'd definitely want to see all forms of it in my search, mega, alolan, or otherwise. We don't discriminate based on shiny versions, so why these?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • JCV said:
    Can I ask why that is? If I was searching for a Pokemon, I'd definitely want to see all forms of it in my search, mega, alolan, or otherwise. We don't discriminate based on shiny versions, so why these?

    Behold: *Persian. You now have both forms of Persian in one search. Such is the power of a wildcard.

    We keep them separate because people may wish to run a search such as alolan_persian persian and only get images featuring both. The most popular pokemon for such a search would be alolan_vulpix vulpix where the Fire and Ice duo is extremely popular.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Behold: *Persian. You now have both forms of Persian in one search. Such is the power of a wildcard.

    We keep them separate because people may wish to run a search such as alolan_persian persian and only get images featuring both. The most popular pokemon for such a search would be alolan_vulpix vulpix where the Fire and Ice duo is extremely popular.

    You are my savior and I owe you a blowjob or some other equitable sexual favor.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2