kieran eelrex (east asian mythology and etc) created by obsydian
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • HDplayer said:
    why the Note?
    it is not a Question...
    the Exclamation Mark fits

    Potentially false. Allow me to demonstrate.

    "Whaddup? Wanna fuck?"
    "Excuse me? I have a boyfriend!"

    *Random person slaps his ass*
    "Excuse me! I have a boyfriend!"

    It depends on the situation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I have a significant other as well. They love to run, they have connections, they know how to get things done so must faster than anyone else, they write, they love to play games, and they have the most beautiful name: Hewlett Packard.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • megaepicraptor said:
    Potentially false. Allow me to demonstrate.

    "Whaddup? Wanna fuck?"
    "Excuse me? I have a boyfriend!"

    *Random person slaps his ass*
    "Excuse me! I have a boyfriend!"

    It depends on the situation.

    That's not where the question mark keeps getting added. One person keeps putting it after "I have a boyfriend" like the character can't believe that they have a boyfriend. That they've been doing this for almost a year and it isn't right, it makes you wonder why they want it changed so much.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • lertcon2014 said:
    How is this tagged ambigious_gender? It's most clearly a male.

    There isn't really anything here to use for distinguishing gender. Only the head is shown, and dragons across all forms of fiction don't have any consistent sexual dimorphisms related to cranial features. Given this and given e621's "tag what you see" policy, since none of the rest of the body is shown, and since the dialogue gives us no real indications other than that the dragon has a significant other who happens to be male, there is no marker of gender that qualifies the usage of the male tag, and thus it is tagged as ambiguous_gender.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • ko-san said:
    That's not where the question mark keeps getting added. One person keeps putting it after "I have a boyfriend" like the character can't believe that they have a boyfriend. That they've been doing this for almost a year and it isn't right, it makes you wonder why they want it changed so much.

    On the one hand, I agree that it isn't right. On the other hand, it's kind of hilarious that it's back again after over three years.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • komuros said:
    There isn't really anything here to use for distinguishing gender. Only the head is shown, and dragons across all forms of fiction don't have any consistent sexual dimorphisms related to cranial features. Given this and given e621's "tag what you see" policy, since none of the rest of the body is shown, and since the dialogue gives us no real indications other than that the dragon has a significant other who happens to be male, there is no marker of gender that qualifies the usage of the male tag, and thus it is tagged as ambiguous_gender.

    Although, it's a Male character

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • a-gaylittleshit said:
    Like you're the dragon's bf or you're asking a taken dragon if he wants to fuck?

    Was thinking more in the first scenario, but if it's the second one maybe could try to suggest that his bf is part of the fun as well-- persuasive skills and stuff, hehe

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0