v-0-1-d created by rajii and sycamorph (editor)
Viewing sample resized to 14% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #998894 that has a sibling (learn more) show »
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Description

Check out my FA (first source link) for more info. Also there's a link to a tool for converting stereograms to anaglyphs (or anything else).

From source:

V O 1 D by Rajii (Stereogram Edit) - by Sycamorph

Original artwork: https://www.furaffinity.net/view/21237904/
Original author: rajii
Original character: V-0-1-D

Sorry for choosing a really wide picture for this one, but whatever. Also now there's an illusion that his taint is way too far, but this is not my fault, it looks way too far even on 2D version to me. Also his dick looks flat. I have no idea why, I used 30 layers for it. That's the same as his legs, but his legs don't look flat to me. Weird. But I might know the reason and will try to avoid it next time.

  • Comments
  • Morcaster said:
    This is perfect for a "Tile" type display for my pc background

    I thought for a second that you didn't get what it is, but now I see that you favourited it... Well, just in case you (or someone else) doesn't know, it's a cross-eyed stereogram - you have to cross your eyes and you'll see a 3D picture.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Sycamorph said:
    I thought for a second that you didn't get what it is, but now I see that you favourited it... Well, just in case you (or someone else) doesn't know, it's a cross-eyed stereogram - you have to cross your eyes and you'll see a 3D picture.

    EVEN BETTER! NOW THERE'S LIKE OVER 100 ON MY SCREEN IF I CROSS MY EYES!!! YAAASS!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
  • Sycamorph said:
    I thought for a second that you didn't get what it is, but now I see that you favourited it... Well, just in case you (or someone else) doesn't know, it's a cross-eyed stereogram - you have to cross your eyes and you'll see a 3D picture.

    I tried it, it does work but on my phone at least I found it fairly difficult to hold focus on the image. Might be too small of a screen though...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • TheTruthTeller said:
    I tried it, it does work but on my phone at least I found it fairly difficult to hold focus on the image. Might be too small of a screen though...

    The problem here is that it's very wide and not many people can cross their eyes so much, you should probably try other stereograms first. It's a lot easier on phone of course, but I guess it still might be hard for some people.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Sycamorph said:
    The problem here is that it's very wide and not many people can cross their eyes so much, you should probably try other stereograms first. It's a lot easier on phone of course, but I guess it still might be hard for some people.

    Ummm... I know what they are and have done hundreds already... I even have at least one book filled with them...

    And I would disagree, I find them much more difficult to do on phone because of interference from your peripheral vision.

    For computer you can just scale down if you need to, but while on your phone you always will see background clutter around your phone which can pull your eyes focus from the image.

    Of course that could very person to person, but is just how I feel.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Man when i found this post and saw void spelt like that i emmidiately thought "haha elon musk's kid" :/ sorry ash and void.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • sycamorph said:
    I thought for a second that you didn't get what it is, but now I see that you favourited it... Well, just in case you (or someone else) doesn't know, it's a cross-eyed stereogram - you have to cross your eyes and you'll see a 3D picture.

    I used it as a parallel and it worked just as good if not better. It looked as if it had actual depth and I could use my eyes to focus on different parts of the image

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I was able to Put this onto a 3DS and see it on the 3D screen. There was no reason to but it was cool to see and honestly better than i expected it to be

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2