I'm glad the artist actually redrew the face in the mirror instead of copy+pasting it. It always looks so obviously fake when they do that.

mercrantos said:
I'm glad the artist actually redrew the face in the mirror instead of copy+pasting it. It always looks so obviously fake when they do that.

can you give an example?

mercrantos said:
I'm glad the artist actually redrew the face in the mirror instead of copy+pasting it. It always looks so obviously fake when they do that.

I think it would have been quite difficult to copy-past it there considering this is a 3/4 view. Wouldn't have made any sense. I get your point though.

mercrantos said:
I'm glad the artist actually redrew the face in the mirror instead of copy+pasting it. It always looks so obviously fake when they do that.

there are still some perspective issues with the image, but the porn part was good enough that i decided to at least finish shading it to upload.

I wonder if an anthro couldn't "flick" their tail back down in an instant if wanted - would they have that control, or would have to think of something sad?

smooth_treader said:
I wonder if an anthro couldn't "flick" their tail back down in an instant if wanted - would they have that control, or would have to think of something sad?

I think they would be able to control tail at least as much as we can control our facial expressons. That is, not always and not perfectly but it wouldn't be complitely involuntary like erection or blushing.

supina said:
I think they would be able to control tail at least as much as we can control our facial expressons. That is, not always and not perfectly but it wouldn't be complitely involuntary like erection or blushing.

i like how you first said erection and then blushing