zahra created by valkoinen
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1120065 that has 2 siblings (learn more) show »
Description

Nude version

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • I do quite enjoy the small details, such as each version of the picture having the appropriate garments that have been removed still being somewhere in the picture, not just randomly gone.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Besides the front-gina and the abdominal twist, this is great!

    (Now seriously, great job coloring, details, face and everything else, but the anatomy at the middle of the body and genitals looks WRONG in so many levels).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I'm not sure what's wrong with the abdomen but I did go back to it and fixed the genitals, now, I have no idea how should I addres the fix here on this post, like, reuploading or what? so anyways, the fix is on the source link for anyone who can edit this post.

    SoulFlame said:
    Besides the front-gina and the abdominal twist, this is great!

    (Now seriously, great job coloring, details, face and everything else, but the anatomy at the middle of the body and genitals looks WRONG in so many levels).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Valkoinen said:
    I'm not sure what's wrong with the abdomen but I did go back to it and fixed the genitals, now, I have no idea how should I addres the fix here on this post, like, reuploading or what? so anyways, the fix is on the source link for anyone who can edit this post.

    Sorry for taking too long to respond, finding a reference for a specific pose sucks, and since I don't know if I can post a link of a naked model for pose reference because of the "non real life naked pictures" policy, that's the closest one I got, it feels like the rectus abdominis lower insertion is not on the pubic bone but a little on the left side, like it is directed to the left acetabulum, looks a bit off placeon the bellybutton area, I don't know if its because of the shading but looks prominent and twisted to the right in relation of the rest of the abdomen.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • SoulFlame said:
    Sorry for taking too long to respond, finding a reference for a specific pose sucks, and since I don't know if I can post a link of a naked model for pose reference because of the "non real life naked pictures" policy, that's the closest one I got, it feels like the rectus abdominis lower insertion is not on the pubic bone but a little on the left side, like it is directed to the left acetabulum, looks a bit off placeon the bellybutton area, I don't know if its because of the shading but looks prominent and twisted to the right in relation of the rest of the abdomen.

    why, yes yes, I went back to studying some anatomy and realised what I had done wrong, it is a matter of shading, I added a bit too much dark into that left side so it looks like it ''sinks''. I'll be studying some more for the next few days to correct any mistakes I may not be realising!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Valkoinen said:
    why, yes yes, I went back to studying some anatomy and realised what I had done wrong, it is a matter of shading, I added a bit too much dark into that left side so it looks like it ''sinks''. I'll be studying some more for the next few days to correct any mistakes I may not be realising!

    That's the wonderful and terrible thing of being an artist, no matter how good you are, there's always room for improvement, you finish something and you get all like "man am I good or am I good?" but after some weeks or months (in my sister's case happens even a day later) you look at your drawings and go "damn, how didn't I see that?"

    And hell, anatomy sure helps a lot, specially in those momments when you finish something and go "something feels off but I don't know why". The problem of looking for picture references on the net is that some might have been photoshoped, and that ends up being detrimental for learning. Books are (almost) always better. Hope you have fun studying, I always do :) (DOODLE TIME!)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0