nintendo and etc created by skygracer
Viewing sample resized to 70% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Right, there, the masculine bodied lizard in the center of the image. Tag What You See: If the body is masculine, it's male.

    You can see breasts. Plus, how does this body look masculine?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Right, there, the masculine bodied lizard in the center of the image. Tag What You See: If the body is masculine, it's male.

    Does 125 50 80 body proportions also looks male to you?:D

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Skygracer said:
    Does 125 50 80 body proportions also looks male to you?:D

    Numbers look ambiguous unless anthropomorphised, at which point it depends on, big surprise, human appearance just like everything else.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    They look like pecs to me, and that musculature in American stereotypes is masculine.

    How are wide hips and small shoulders masculine proportians? And, also, what musculature? And also, i don't think the presence of muscles is enough to tag gender.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • most_downvoted_guy said:
    im sorry but... you wouldnt see woman unless she sat on your face but its still not confirmed if that would work
    https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/9b/e2/1d/9be21d4fc7f8cbf2a97f892605e6f980.jpg

    Bulma has boobs. No visible muscles to suggest those are anything but.
    Try this image, though, and TWYS would say it's ambiguous. Sure, canonically, Chi Chi is a woman, and yeah, she's got boobs. E621's rules, however, state you can only tag based on what's in the image: Her arms are blocking off any view of the boobs, and nothing else about her in that image says she's obviously female.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Bulma has boobs. No visible muscles to suggest those are anything but.
    Try this image, though, and TWYS would say it's ambiguous. Sure, canonically, Chi Chi is a woman, and yeah, she's got boobs. E621's rules, however, state you can only tag based on what's in the image: Her arms are blocking off any view of the boobs, and nothing else about her in that image says she's obviously female.

    https://youtu.be/uc0PEfQRlww?t=24
    >_>

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Skygracer said:
    Does 125 50 80 body proportions also looks male to you?:D

    You know people draw whatever suits their tastes.I've seen some...

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • furrin_gok said:
    Right, there, the masculine bodied lizard in the center of the image. Tag What You See: If the body is masculine, it's male.

    it baffles me, four years later, that nobody pointed out how salazzle is an all female species

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • crypticboii said:
    it baffles me, four years later, that nobody pointed out how salazzle is an all female species

    That's a lore thing, not a what's-in-this-image-specifically thing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • furrin_gok said:
    Right, there, the masculine bodied lizard in the center of the image. Tag What You See: If the body is masculine, it's male.

    Salazzle is a female only species, like Nidoqueens

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • horny_salt said:
    Salazzle is a female only species, like Nidoqueens

    Hey, take a look at the crossgender tag. Plenty of salazzle crossgender. Used to be a lot of nidoqueen crossgender too but apparently somebody went around falsely removing those.

    Wait, apparently NotMeNotYou was the one who changed the wiki to state that??? I'm going to have to look into this a bit. Without the crossgender tag those images are next to impossible to find.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1