mikhaila kirov (patreon) created by tsampikos
Viewing sample resized to 91% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Skylar257 said:
    Oh by the GODS, WHO TAGGED MALE ON THIS?!

    'SHE' IS A FLAT CHESTED FEMALE! WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS!

    Kronau said:
    Probably the retarded admin as he seems to be the only one pushing that

    There's nothing to show that she's a girl in this picture. The TWYS rule applies to every post on this site, no exceptions. I see an ambiguous gender individual. In order to tag this as either gender, you need to see the breasts vag, or dick. With flat-chested females, a lot of people could even see them as cuntboys, or in this case, see them as a feminine male, because you cannot see the genitals. The exception for TWYS is for character NAMES, not gender, species or anything else. Seriously this site has been around for so long, and nearly every time I go on it I find people who refuse to abide by the site's rules. Why is it so hard to understand that on this site you need to tag WHAT YOU SEE so the blacklist can work correctly? People get so offended about pictures having tags that don't represent the character, I don't get it. The TWYS rule is important to the site, yet so many people ignore it and say the admins are retarded for enforcing it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • Skylar257 said:
    Oh by the GODS, WHO TAGGED MALE ON THIS?!

    'SHE' IS A FLAT CHESTED FEMALE! WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THIS!

    This image counts as a girly male, your outside knowledge has no bearing here.

    Kronau said:
    Probably the retarded admin as he seems to be the only one pushing that

    If you want to get banned you're on the right track to it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    This image counts as a girly male, your outside knowledge has no bearing here.

    If you want to get banned you're on the right track to it.

    Dude can you not be a defense force. Please.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • BigFau said:
    Dude can you not be a defense force. Please.

    Ensuring the rules are enforced is literally what I do here. You might as well ask the universe to stop gravitational forces from working.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    Ensuring the rules are enforced is literally what I do here. You might as well ask the universe to stop gravitational forces from working.

    All things weather in time.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • if anything it should be tagged as ambiguous_gender
    as RR67 said, other people could see this as girly, while others as flat_chested
    cases like this gets subjectiveness in the way of the rule, where the closest thing to a compromise, would be to tag it as ambiguous_gender

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Uhm...when the creator of the character has stated the character is Female. In turn. This is a female character from the creator.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Master_Snipe said:
    Uhm...when the creator of the character has stated the character is Female. In turn. This is a female character from the creator.

    Doesn't matter, TWYS reigns supreme here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • The face is far too feminine for male tag, also those hips suggest female skeletal structure.
    On top of that, the appearance of the fat deposits on the arms is also distinctly female.

    If "tag what you see" reigns supreme then surely it should take into account more than just one set of eyes.

    Using the male tag on this is pretty darn offensive to flat-chested females.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • NotMeNotYou said:
    This image counts as a girly male, your outside knowledge has no bearing here.

    How does the TWYS rule work with pictures that only show faces? Without outside knowledge you can't determine whether male or female, but they are still tagged accordingly.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5