created by anon ihmus
Viewing sample resized to 98% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

STFU!!!!!!!!
By Anon_Ihmus, posted Apr 16, 2008 08:32 PM Digital Artist

"I dont LIKE what you're posting in your gallery!! It goes against my religion/morals/beliefs/I cant fap to it!!!!!! BAWWWWWW!!!!!! MY OPINION IS VALID!"
This is not directed at any single person. I chose foxes because foxes are generic, like white people.... Oh, and that is the Boner of Justice.

First time dealing with screen tones. I like how it came out. =3

+++Two Four SIX EIGHT! TWELVE FUCKING YEARS later and this is still getting favorites and comments! Holy fuck!! Thank you all so so much!!!

Well, errors and all, I'm glad I drew this, and I still stand behind it. =3
I feel the need to add now, though, that this isn't for just opinions, this is about people who try to impose their MORALS on others. It's ok if you don't like something, and it's ok to tell someone you don't like it- but it's another thing entirely to tell someone THEY shouldn't like something.
That's the line. Feel however you want, tell people about it, fine, but don't try to tell people they're wrong for liking what they like, or that they have to be like you- because they're not wrong, and they don't have to be like you.
+++
Redistribute (for free) at will, please link back- but DO NOT ALTER!!

Later, final note- you are free to color and post this to your own gallery IF it is linked back here with credit.

  • Comments
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    I like how gay was included in the list.

    It's one of the things people whine about~

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • sdrawkcabmai said:
    trolls receiving justice. thank you.

    Trolls just do it for a reaction, this is more of a white knight thing.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • There's a fine line between ranting about the immorality of a fetish and merely stating your opinion on what you think of it. I wish more people could distinguish the difference.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • DrewPickles said:
    There's a fine line between ranting about the immorality of a fetish and merely stating your opinion on what you think of it. I wish more people could distinguish the difference.

    There's also a fine line between fetish and mental issue, for lack of a better term. Morality often doesn't apply to that as much as common sense. Feel free to give me a bunch of shit over this though, I guess.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Cedric_Cross said:
    There's also a fine line between fetish and mental issue, for lack of a better term. Morality often doesn't apply to that as much as common sense. Feel free to give me a bunch of shit over this though, I guess.

    I agree with that as well. It's common knowledge that eating shit and mutilating yourself isn't... healthy, that's for sure.

    I guess it's one of those things where I'd mind my own business. It's his/her own problem if he/she ends up with a nasty infection or injury.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • A bunch of shit.

    Cedric_Cross said:
    There's also a fine line between fetish and mental issue, for lack of a better term. Morality often doesn't apply to that as much as common sense. Feel free to give me a bunch of shit over this though, I guess.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • gamer9087 said:
    so many of us wish we could do this. i am sure the numbers would be in the mil XD

    yep, its been my life-long dream. although i wouldn't just knock them out. i'd start, by pulling their computer off the desk, just because its a quick easy way to make sure it gets destroyed. as they look on in horror, thats when i knock them out. ^^

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • gamer9087 said:
    so many of us wish we could do this.

    Indeed. I wish I could free MY interwebs from things I deem wrong! ;)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • DrewPickles said:
    I agree with that as well. It's common knowledge that eating shit and mutilating yourself isn't... healthy, that's for sure.

    I guess it's one of those things where I'd mind my own business. It's his/her own problem if he/she ends up with a nasty infection or injury.

    There's also the fact that, you know...people are allowed to look at stuff and not want to do it in real life. Because someone likes looking at vore porn doesn't mean their into it in real life. All these people who say certain fetishes are immoral (bestiality, cub, vore, snuff) need to realize the looker doesn't necessarily want to really do those things. It's called FANTASY for a reason.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Cedric_Cross said:
    There's also a fine line between fetish and mental issue, for lack of a better term. Morality often doesn't apply to that as much as common sense. Feel free to give me a bunch of shit over this though, I guess.

    Yup. Modern psychology sets this line as follows: Drawing pleasure out of damaging oneself or others is a mental issue - masochism and sadism - everything else is not. Now show me an internet fetish those could apply to.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • WolfieWolfie1992 said:
    ...I saw such horrible things on MY internet! I'm telling my mom on you!

    Don't forget the BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • DrewPickles said:
    I agree with that as well. It's common knowledge that eating shit and mutilating yourself isn't... healthy, that's for sure.

    I guess it's one of those things where I'd mind my own business. It's his/her own problem if he/she ends up with a nasty infection or injury.

    Funny thing about people bitching about the fetishes. People know its not real, which is why they like it.

    Furries, of anyone, should appreciate that

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • It's one thing to voice your opinion on something. It's another to lie, slander or otherwise seek to harm those who either have such a fetish, regardless of their actions offline, or to rant about the immorality of certain things while ignoring or drawing fuzzy lines around a fetish that the person ranting may have. If you go with 'cub is immoral because it's like pedophilia' than ALL furry art is immoral because it is LIKE bestiality. And bondage is wrong because it is LIKE rape. Or that anal is wrong because it is LIKE scat (or at least uses the same orifices). Drawing a line is GOOD, real kid pictures or real beast pictures should be kept banned and for good reason, just like rape and snuff films should be banned. But when that line goes into what is obviously pure and unadulterated fantasy with no ties to real life, than that line is too far. Especially when it somehow leaps over what the person holding the view likes personally, regardless of the similarities to what they deem immoral. [/rant]

    Also lol furry drama OH NOES

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Minalkra said:
    It's one thing to voice your opinion on something. It's another to lie, slander or otherwise seek to harm those who either have such a fetish, regardless of their actions offline, or to rant about the immorality of certain things while ignoring or drawing fuzzy lines around a fetish that the person ranting may have. If you go with 'cub is immoral because it's like pedophilia' than ALL furry art is immoral because it is LIKE bestiality. And bondage is wrong because it is LIKE rape. Or that anal is wrong because it is LIKE scat (or at least uses the same orifices). Drawing a line is GOOD, real kid pictures or real beast pictures should be kept banned and for good reason, just like rape and snuff films should be banned. But when that line goes into what is obviously pure and unadulterated fantasy with no ties to real life, than that line is too far. Especially when it somehow leaps over what the person holding the view likes personally, regardless of the similarities to what they deem immoral. [/rant]

    Also lol furry drama OH NOES

    You, sir or madam, have finally voiced what I've been trying to say for the longest time and did you it much more succinctly than I've been able to thus far in hundreds or arguments on this topic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Isn't it just easier to say none of us are fully alright in the head, arguments are bound to happen, and leave it at that? The author of this comic got his E-peen points for saying what everyone was thinking for one thing or another, after all. We're all just mad because we didn't think of it first.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Shitake said:
    Cub and pedo art isn't WRONG because it's like actual pedophilia. It's SICK because it's like actual pedophilia.

    That would be your opinion. No one forces you to look like it. Again, why is cub porn wrong while furry porn in general is fine for you? You don't find bestiality sick?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • See, I don't mind pedophilia, but I don't particularly like cub, so...
    Also, I want to point out the distinction Shitake is making: It isn't "wrong." It's "sick." Wrong is a personal opinion, I think, whereas "sick" is a societal norm. Ie, pedophilia. It is "sick." Doesn't mean I think it's "wrong," though.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • This is furries for ya.

    They take so much pride in the wrong things they do they actually defend it.

    Don't people realize that fetishes are best kept in close doors? Except gays because it's who they are and it's the humane thing to do; but everything these furries are they expect to be defended.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • yes since violence is always the answer and clearly means the person giving the violence is the more mature, reasonable one >.>

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1