You can not view this image.

Children: 1 child (learn more) show »

This post was deleted or flagged for the following reasons:

Description

The End of A Good Evening - Commission

Another one done for yinx

Enjoy

Yinx belongs to yinx

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Actini said:
    Oh will you stop fucking it up for the rest of us?
    You creepy, creepy fuck.

    What are you, a closet homophobe?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -8
  • JMay said:
    What are you, a closet homophobe?

    I'm as accepting as I can be (even after multiple cases of the goggles doing nothing) and I still find him creepy. It's a good thing that someone can feel safe enough here to tell us their fantasies, but I really don't need to hear them.

    Also, I WANT TO BE THAT SIGNATURE!!!!1!11!ELEVEN!!!!ONE1111!!1

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I WANT TO BE the very best! Like no one ever was! To catch them is my real test. To train them is my cause! >.> Yeah, it was bound to happen... !!!!!!3.417!!!!!!cake!!!!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • JMay said:
    Being creepy is against the rules on a website that exists for the archival of furry porn? I hope you realize how retarded that sounds.

    And how is expressing a desire to be part of a work "being creepy?"

    The fact of the matter is, people get banned for being creepy. How you choose to interpret that is entirely your prerogative. And calling a mod retarded probably isn't the best way to express your opinion. Food for thought :3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Aurali said:
    No, being creepy is against the rules. >( Go to FA if you want to do that.

    And this lil' lady, folks, is why I love e621.
    Now we can all go back to enjoying our porn like proper civil people until someone starts trolling again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • ippiki_ookami said:
    And calling a mod retarded probably isn't the best way to express your opinion. Food for thought :3

    Calling a rule that someone enforces retarded is not the same as calling that person retarded.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • JMay said:
    Calling a rule that someone enforces retarded is not the same as calling that person retarded.

    The whole arguing with a mod thing is probably not the best move after calling them retarded.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • blarggralb said:
    Generic stuff about rules being broken in the end.

    Actually, this board's policy on creeps matches the IRL policy fairly well. Person gets creepy, gets a warning, continues, and is ultimately punished.

    Also, the amount of people continuing to be creepy after getting a warning or a temporary ban is smaller than the amount of people continuing to be creepy and heading for the lifetime-ban.

    JMay said:
    Saying, "wow, that's hot, I would love to be him," is not.

    People don't get banned for saying that. Read Sethoroth's comment log again.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • JMay said:
    Call me a weirdo, but I actually like to see someone express their attraction toward a work that I am also attracted to.

    ^This. Unless it's chocked full of spelling/grammar errors. Those kill my boner.

    Hey, that makes grammar errors creepy right? Can we ban people for that?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • JMay said:
    Saying, "wow, that's hot, I would love to be him," is not.

    I get it. You have the power to enforce the rules, but I'm just sayin'.

    No, there is a difference between "I would love to be him" and "OMG I LOVE TO BE HIM, MY LIFE HAS NO MEANING IF I DON'T BEND HIM OVER AND CUM ALL OVER HIS INSIDES" No one gets banned for the minor stuff.. it's the overly creepy stuff that gets you.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • JMay said:Telling people that I will find where they live, go to their house, wait in the closet, jump out and grab them, tie them upside down from the ceiling and rape their mouth for five days is being creepy.

    Yes, please?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Ok, enough nitpicking already. Conclusion: said comment about this picture wasn't necessarily creepy, but other kind of comments like the kind mentioned by aurali can be. It is to the site moderators to decide wether something can be considered creepy and therefore a bannable offense.

    What still needs to be discussed in my humble opinion is wether or not it is to the users to decide wether or not something is creepy and making comments containing this opinion.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Seththedragon said:
    What still needs to be discussed in my humble opinion is wether or not it is to the users to decide wether or not something is creepy and making comments containing this opinion.

    I certainly don't think it is up to regular members like Actini to start calling out people who they think are creepy in such an insulting way.

    As for actually deciding what is considered 'creepy,' that's obviously up to the mods; they have the power to make and enforce the rules after all. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't give your arguments. Completely disregarding the opinions of users is no way to run a website.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • JMay said:
    I certainly don't think it is up to regular members like Actini to start calling out people who they think are creepy in such an insulting way.

    As for actually deciding what is considered 'creepy,' that's obviously up to the mods; they have the power to make and enforce the rules after all. But that doesn't mean that you shouldn't give your arguments. Completely disregarding the opinions of users is no way to run a website.

    The user above was banned for other reasons.. I only said that "Being creepy was against the rules" to not let people think they can get away with going overboard with it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Aurali said:
    The user above was banned for other reasons.. I only said that "Being creepy was against the rules" to not let people think they can get away with going overboard with it.

    A little clarification would have been nice. It seemed an awful lot like you were responding to my first post, in support of Actini's accusations.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • JMay said:Telling people that I will find where they live, go to their house, wait in the closet, jump out and grab them, tie them upside down from the ceiling and rape their mouth for five days is being creepy.

    i would actually like that >.>

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • AinaGothly said:
    i would actually like that >.>

    Then it wouldn't be 'rape their mouth' anymore, would it?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • It still would be "rape their mouth". Rape isn't "I DISLIKED THAT, YOU FAGGOT!" Instead, it's more about being forced into having sex. Of course, the one being forced may follow through with it and make it seem like they're not being raped.

    Also, if rape was the former, people would be doing this more often:
    "Raped" person: He raped me
    Judge: ..and you know this, how?
    "Raped" person: I didn't like it.
    "Raper": You said you LOVED it, you liar!
    [...]
    "Raper" gets successfully sued/sent to prison for "raping" someone.

    It's supposed to be more like this:

    Raped person: He raped me.
    Judge: How do you know?
    Raped person: I have video footage, and plus, he FORCED me into it. *gives security footage, who in turn gives it to the judge*
    Judge: I see...
    Accused raper: ..(s)he LOVES having sex with me.
    Raped person: Yet you FORCED me into it. I know for a fact that you're not supposed to force people into sex. That's rape.
    Judge: (S)He's right, you know.
    [...]
    Accused rapist becomes charged of being an actual rapist.
    ----------

    tl;dr, Rape: Forced sex. "Un"liked sex: self-explanatory. Report rape, not "un"liked sex. (IRL, anyway. If it happens on the internet, there's not much you can really do about it.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Yellowtail said:
    It still would be "rape their mouth". Rape isn't "I DISLIKED THAT, YOU FAGGOT!" Instead, it's more about being forced into having sex. Of course, the one being forced may follow through with it and make it seem like they're not being raped.

    Also, if rape was the former, people would be doing this more often:
    "Raped" person: He raped me
    Judge: ..and you know this, how?
    "Raped" person: I didn't like it.
    "Raper": You said you LOVED it, you liar!
    [...]
    "Raper" gets successfully sued/sent to prison for "raping" someone.

    It's supposed to be more like this:

    Raped person: He raped me.
    Judge: How do you know?
    Raped person: I have video footage, and plus, he FORCED me into it. *gives security footage, who in turn gives it to the judge*
    Judge: I see...
    Accused raper: ..(s)he LOVES having sex with me.
    Raped person: Yet you FORCED me into it. I know for a fact that you're not supposed to force people into sex. That's rape.
    Judge: (S)He's right, you know.
    [...]
    Accused rapist becomes charged of being an actual rapist.
    ----------

    tl;dr, Rape: Forced sex. "Un"liked sex: self-explanatory. Report rape, not "un"liked sex. (IRL, anyway. If it happens on the internet, there's not much you can really do about it.)

    ^^^this^^^

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1