mikhaila kirov created by tsampikos
Viewing sample resized to 83% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #318353 (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Topi said:
    Photoshopped away the penis, huh? This is/was a hardblush pic, if I recall correctly.

    Nope, this is Mikhaila a flat breasted Female Otter. So it haven't been photoshopped.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Topi said:
    Photoshopped away the penis, huh? This is/was a hardblush pic, if I recall correctly.

    His character was used in a SexyFur comic but he does his own art, and this should be the original version (without the penis.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • It looks like this was done second. If you look at the penis one, and then take a mental note of the outline of it is, and then look at this one, you can see there is a difference to the texture to where the penis was - which could only have been done if the penis was shopped out.

    There should be no reason why there is a difference of texture if the penis was added on 2nd.

    Of course, I do understand that this character was a flat-chested female, but thats not saying somebody specially paid to have her with a penis - and then the artist decided, why let this go to waste as a penis version, I'll make her natural female version after already completing the penis version.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • We all should know that Mikhaila is a flat-chested female. They exist, 'ya know. Just because they don't have boobs and have a vagina doesn't mean you idiots need to go "'SHOP!!!! IT'S SHOPPED!!" Okay, we get it, you like the one with the dick better. Before you label something, make sure you have gathered all the facts beforehand, otherwise, you'll look like a moron.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • AshuraK said:
    A cuntboy otter?
    Those seem so common.

    Ah the obligatory "Flat chested females don't exist" ignorant comment that tends to come with every flat chested female picture

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • There are two versions of this picture. One was done for Hardblush so the artist changed it and put on a penis big deal. Its not been shopped its version 2

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Everyone is wrong..... There are TWINS!! :O
    Just kidding,the original Mikhaila is the one without a penis.
    The one with a penis was a edited version. Now can we stop talkin about this and fap to the sexiness of the hot flat chested nice ass otter? :3

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • AshuraK said:
    A cuntboy otter?
    Those seem so common.

    equimanthorn said:
    Ah the obligatory "Flat chested females don't exist" ignorant comment that tends to come with every flat chested female picture

    I beg your pardon!?

    Firstly, I love cuntboy pictures.
    Secondly, your assessment and retort to my comment are flawed. I was simply stating that there seems to be more c-boy otters than cuntboys of other species; I was only asking a rhetorical question, not judging cuntboys and/or flat-chested females.
    Thirdly, I know better than to disrespect c-boys. I have a friend who is a RL c-boy... and he was borne that way, before you stick in the obligatory "oh, he probably got a surgery".

    In closing, have a nice day; may some other jumping-to-conclusions idiot misread your comments.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • First time i saw this char. you all have officially confused me. but am leaning more towards the Female idea (cause imma straight lol), mostly cause this looks like its higher quality than the version with the penis. Meh...i will just close my mouth and see what other sexyness (the char) is involved in.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Xavier said:
    We all should know that Mikhaila is a flat-chested female. They exist, 'ya know. Just because they don't have boobs and have a vagina doesn't mean you idiots need to go "'SHOP!!!! IT'S SHOPPED!!" Okay, we get it, you like the one with the dick better. Before you label something, make sure you have gathered all the facts beforehand, otherwise, you'll look like a moron.

    The only thing I can say is get used to it. That type of mentality follows this crowd.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • equimanthorn said:
    Ah the obligatory "Flat chested females don't exist" ignorant comment that tends to come with every flat chested female picture

    Sad isn't it? It just shows that people like really don't come into contact with many women, otherwise they wouldn't say shit like this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Actually, this is a HardBlush image with a penis photoshopped out of it. Sorry guys; the vag was taken from another pic, it was linked above.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Casoron said:
    This one's clearly the photoshop.

    Ghost_Aspergers said:
    The pussy was taken from this drawing.

    http://www.e621.net/post/show/53931/2008-anus-assless_chaps-bent_over-blush-boots-brow

    Tsampikos has stated that he designed this character as male originally and made the character female in later illustrations. This has nothing to do with definitions of male and female or anything in between; it's about using your eyes. Look carefully at the details of the background between her legs any you can see the outline of where it has been patched in to cover the penis. I just wish whoever did this edit would come forward and end this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2