baccus loka and krystal (nintendo and etc) created by bittenhard
Description

It looks like someone will have to leave a message...

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Who keeps one removing the Cuckold tag? Have you seen the original site where this image comes from? It's labeled as Cuckolding. That's what's happening in the story and in the image. So stop removing it, please -_-

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • William0302 said:
    Who keeps one removing the Cuckold tag? Have you seen the original site where this image comes from? It's labeled as Cuckolding. That's what's happening in the story and in the image. So stop removing it, please -_-

    tag what you see. that is the rules of this website, is it not?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Cai_Enes said:
    tag what you see. that is the rules of this website, is it not?

    Rrrrright.

    Besides being in context with the story, that is what is happening. Fox is trying to call her, but she's *ahem* too busy. She's cheating on him. He's a cuck. Deal with it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Whatever. Believe what you wanna believe and tag what you wanna tag. I posted what I saw and tagged it the way the original source did. Have a nice day.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Due to the phone in the picture this is definitely cuckold, or "implied_cuckold" at the absolute minimum (if you wanted to make a new tag for it).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 17
  • William0302 said:
    Rrrrright.

    Besides being in context with the story, that is what is happening. Fox is trying to call her, but she's *ahem* too busy. She's cheating on him. He's a cuck. Deal with it.

    I am not here to argue semantics here. I could not care less whether it's cuckold. but if there is no relationship in the photo itself, it is improper tagging.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Mittsies said:
    Due to the phone in the picture this is definitely cuckold, or "implied_cuckold" at the absolute minimum (if you wanted to make a new tag for it).

    that assumes that they are in a relationship, which is beyond the scope of this picture. it could be Falco calling, would that make it cuckold?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • I removed it, this time. I was just following the rules, is all.

    "Considered a humiliation kink, it is a male whose female companion is unfaithful. Usually the male knows the female is unfaithful, and at times, helps to find her a partner for whatever reason whether it be to watch, to help pleasure her more because the male knows he just can't offer what others can, or just because the male doesn't want to have sex in a relationship but the female does."

    Fox is not in the setting, thus he has no knowledge of the scene and is not being humiliated. Cheating definitely applies. Yes, I know the context of the story, and in every instance that Bittenhard has drawn it, it is cuckolding- but this ain't.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Ratte said:
    Not much to go by in the image so keep the cuckold-related tags off.

    Here's how I view it, personally...

    It's tag what you see, right? I clearly see Krystal's phone ringing while she gets pounded by another guy. It doesn't matter who's calling that phone, whether it be Falco or Slippy, they is a clear implication that they are being left out of the action. While the term Cuckolding may traditionally imply husband and wife, the term used in the fetish sense has long sense evolved to include anything from boyfriend, a high-school crush, or a total stranger you met moments ago. It could be two rivals lusting after the same girl. If it's a semantics issue that's clogging everything up, use new terms like netorare, sexual_jealousy, implied_cuckold, or whatever you want.

    Let's imagine a hypothetical scenario here. You have 3 people in a room, any gender. If two of those people are having sex, and one of them is watching, that's cuckolding. Whether or not they are in a strict relationship is irrelevant to this fetish.

    Now imagine you have the same scenario except the third person is now downstairs reading a book. Nothing has changed: you are being shown a third person being explicitly left out of the action, which makes it cuckolding. In this Krystal picture the cellphone is clearly there to imply that Fox is being left out of the picture (quite literally). No matter how much you abstract it: as long as there's the implication that there is at least one person being left out of the action, it's cuckolding. It doesn't matter if it's a love letter, a photo of the characters on a date, a computer with a text conversation on Skype... this element is added to show that the third character is being cucked.

    Cuckold is a fetish that is heavily reliant on CONTEXT. For instance, take literally any picture on e621 where two characters are having sex, and make one of them say "You're so much better at this than my boyfriend!" Boom. Cuckolding. The actual picture itself has not changed but you added some context and now suddenly the picture is cuckolding. That's what the cellphone does here: it adds context the same way dialogue would.

    Again this is just my view. Feel free to disagree.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • I'm glad that everyone here has an autistic mission sent by god to fuck with the tags.

    What's the worst case scenario here? That people looking for the most intense cuck pictures imaginable are somewhat disappointed?

    Adding the tag allows users looking for what is absolutely implied in the image to find it, while removing it helps keep some sort of tag purity when every single person knows that is the point of the image.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Mittsies said:

    Let's imagine a hypothetical scenario here. You have 3 people in a room, any gender. If two of those people are having sex, and one of them is watching, that's cuckolding. Whether or not they are in a strict relationship is irrelevant to this fetish.

    Actually, watching is an entirely different fetish to cuckolding, so that example doesn't work. For it to be cuckold they have to be in a relationship.

    Otherwise any time a room-mate of a character in a scene having sex with their S.O. would be Cuckold which just isn't how that fetish works.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Mittsies said:

    Let's imagine a hypothetical scenario here. You have 3 people in a room, any gender. If two of those people are having sex, and one of them is watching, that's cuckolding. Whether or not they are in a strict relationship is irrelevant to this fetish.

    Wrong. Relationship status must necessarily be defined to figure out if it's actual cuckoldry. What you have just described here is a fetish, but it's not cuckoldry- it's called voyeurism.

    Now imagine you have the same scenario except the third person is now downstairs reading a book. Nothing has changed: you are being shown a third person being explicitly left out of the action, which makes it cuckolding.

    ... Or, alternatively, it's two people having sex while a third person who may or may not be related at all to the first two one is downstairs. You've removed not one, but two pieces of context in this scenario- 1. Whether or not he/she knows the first two are having sex, and 2. Whether or not said person actually gives a shit if the first 2 are having sex.

    Either way, it's still not cuckoldry.

    In this Krystal picture the cellphone is clearly there to imply that Fox is being left out of the picture (quite literally).

    At best, that is cheating. I've read the story, and these two aren't even married, so it's not even adultery. No matter how you want to spin it, cheating is not cuckoldry. Cuckoldry can involve cheating, but doesn't necessarily need to, either.

    No matter how much you abstract it: as long as there's the implication that there is at least one person being left out of the action, it's cuckolding.

    ... So... by that definition, every time two people have sex, the entire rest of the world is being cuckolded? Because you insisted earlier that relationship and whether or not a person would be humiliated is "irrelevant".

    Just stop. It's clear you have no clue what you're talking about.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • Everyone going "OMG Fox is a cuck!" How do we know it isn't just a business call, like "Krystal, we need all hands on deck."?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • The_Soldier said:
    Everyone going "OMG Fox is a cuck!" How do we know it isn't just a business call, like "Krystal, we need all hands on deck."?

    Was just about to say this. It could just be strictly business, since their relationship in this image is not confirmed to have any romantic status.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Wow. Check out all this butthurt downvoting- all because people can't discern between "cuckolding" and "cheating".

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Spoonman said:
    Wow. Check out all this butthurt downvoting- all because people can't discern between "cuckolding" and "cheating".

    Yeah, this spiraled a bit too out of control. I was just trying to tag is like the original source on SoFurry. Not start a comment war -_-

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Lapsa said:
    The comic establishes that its cuckolding - and I see this imagine having implications as previous ones have had.

    Doesn't matter. Feretta's comic, Tale of Tails, has established that Fen is a herm, possessing both a cock and a pussy. Despite this, "tag what you see" rules still apply, so if the cock is the only genital visible, it's labeled dickgirl, not herm.

    And taking this image by itself, it's still not cuckolding- Fox would need to be present and getting off to his inferiority, yet there's nothing visible in the image to suggest he's aware that Krystal is getting plowed. At -best-, it's cheating, and as the context of the comic is irrelevant in tagging there's nothing to indicate that the two are in a relationship.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • man this literally is cuckolding and it is literally impossible to tag this as cuckolding. That's pretty fucked.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Wow thanks guys, I'm glad you made it HARDER to find cuck art just so you don't get your feelings hurt by a tag you don't like

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • it is cuckolding, i feel cucked by this situation due to Fox and Crystals established relationship and i project myself onto Fox. crystal is cheating on Fox with this lizard, the fetish does not require the cucked charecter to know they are being cucked.
    Spoonman your arguement is valid honestly, and this is like 4 years old at this point but please allow the cuckold tag on this one.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • "Just use the blacklist" they say, as they make it impossible to add your blacklisted tags to pictures that contain the subject matter.
    Edit: Anyone downvoting this is welcome to add the cuckold tag to this image.

    Updated

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1