You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Fun fact of the day: It has acctually become illeagal to kick a guy in the groin area, since the pain given can kill the person even if it is 1 out of a billion people. Get the hit right on one testicle and it breaks it can kill or make the guy paralyzed for life from the waist down (Remember this happens only if the testicles are hit and they break, and it ain't many who can kick that hard to be honest).
    Women say they get the same pain, but it ain't entirely true though it hurts them enough to be a chargable offence still XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 10
  • Narji said:
    Fun fact of the day: It has acctually become illeagal to kick a guy in the groin area, since the pain given can kill the person even if it is 1 out of a billion people. Get the hit right on one testicle and it breaks it can kill or make the guy paralyzed for life from the waist down (Remember this happens only if the testicles are hit and they break, and it ain't many who can kick that hard to be honest).
    Women say they get the same pain, but it ain't entirely true though it hurts them enough to be a chargable offence still XD

    I'm going to assume it's still legal to cut the skin off newborn's penises though. Which is damaging 100% of the time.
    Hypocritical laws and hypocritical.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 18
  • Leeham991dark said:
    I'm going to assume it's still legal to cut the skin off newborn's penises though. Which is damaging 100% of the time.
    Hypocritical laws and hypocritical.

    And since when did the Foreskin become your Ballsack? And getting Circumzised as newborn is much better than when adult (As I were when I got my circumzation it hurt like fuvk) and it ain't permanent damage such as a crushed testicle would do.

    redweasel said:

    I rather watch a kids show than Foxnews which ain't even aired here XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • Leeham991dark said:
    I'm going to assume it's still legal to cut the skin off newborn's penises though. Which is damaging 100% of the time.
    Hypocritical laws and hypocritical.

    Christ, what the hell is with this hate of cut dicks? Why are people with uncut dicks so offensive towards cut dicks?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 12
  • Piphalsey said:
    Christ, what the hell is with this hate of cut dicks? Why are people with uncut dicks so offensive towards cut dicks?

    Dunno, I got mine cut cause of Health Issues. Those who have uncut can keep it that way, but if they need it cut I recomment getting them cut. The acctual damage we get is not really much else than a small wound that takes like 1-3 weeks to heal, also the first week is the hardest since the sensitivity of the head will make it hard to move without it being a pain, then it will be easy to move around as normal again. XD

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Leeham991dark said:
    I'm going to assume it's still legal to remove wisdom teeth before they become impacted. Which is damaging 100% of the time.
    Hypocritical laws and hypocritical.

    (also I butthurt at cut cocks)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Narji said:
    Fun fact of the day: It has acctually become illeagal to kick a guy in the groin area, since the pain given can kill the person even if it is 1 out of a billion people.

    Illegal where?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Piphalsey said:
    Christ, what the hell is with this hate of cut dicks? Why are people with uncut dicks so offensive towards cut dicks?

    Is it offensive to point out that your parents put you into surgery as a newborn and had irreversible damage done to your genitals for no reason whatsoever?

    foxchild said:

    Wisdom teeth aren't made of sexually sensitive tissue and protect your glans from becoming dry and insensitive. Also the removal of wisdom teeth doesn't mean you need to use lube to eat.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 14
  • Narji said:
    And since when did the Foreskin become your Ballsack? And getting Circumzised as newborn is much better than when adult (As I were when I got my circumzation it hurt like fuvk) and it ain't permanent damage such as a crushed testicle would do.

    True. I've been cut for 12 years, and watching the slow degradation of my glans and loss of sensitivity would have had less impact if that's how I thought it was supposed to be.
    Bottom line is it shouldn't happen at all.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • Leeham991dark said:
    Is it offensive to point out that your parents put you into surgery as a newborn and had irreversible damage done to your genitals for no reason whatsoever?

    Wisdom teeth aren't made of sexually sensitive tissue and protect your glans from becoming dry and insensitive. Also the removal of wisdom teeth doesn't mean you need to use lube to eat.

    "damage"

    lol hysterics

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • CamKitty said:
    "damage"

    lol hysterics

    Technically it is damage since it is the removal of tissue. Whether it is a big deal or not is debatable. There is a measurable loss in sensitivity... that much is true.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 13
  • Piphalsey said:
    Christ, what the hell is with this hate of cut dicks? Why are people with uncut dicks so offensive towards cut dicks?

    You know that comment works the other way around too. Guys with cut ones tend to tjose with uncut ones Just the same.

    Leeham991dark said:
    True. I've been cut for 12 years, and watching the slow degradation of my glans and loss of sensitivity would have had less impact if that's how I thought it was supposed to be.
    Bottom line is it shouldn't happen at all.

    Glad I have full sensitivity ;)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • Patty-Cakes_S. said:
    You know that comment works the other way around too. Guys with cut ones tend to hate those with uncut ones Just the same.

    Fixed typographical error.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Piphalsey said:
    Christ, what the hell is with this hate of cut dicks? Why are people with uncut dicks so offensive towards cut dicks?

    I get offended when people cut pieces off live babies. That's just a pet peeve of mine.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • I'm very annoyed by the Bible fanatics that don't actually pay attention to what's in the Bible. I read it...

    Circumcision is archaic thanks to Christ's sacrifice...

    STOP CUTTING OUR PENISES APART TO PLEASE GOD! That law flew out the window in the New Testament!

    Sure...there are rare cases when an adult male needs his foreskin removed.

    I want mine back. But I'll settle for a sheath graft.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Anyone notice all this talk about circumcision has nothing to do with the image except that it involves dicks?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 11
  • Lupo said:
    Anyone notice all this talk about circumcision has nothing to do with the image except that it involves dicks?

    Yup

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I don't see any real issue. Then again, its not like you can decide to be uncut one day, then go back to being cut to see what the difference is. I personally still have my foreskin attatched, and up until around the age of 15, I thought this completely normal. But most porn stars (lets not give them too much credit with "actors") are completely cut, which led me to ask the question. Truth is, there is no difference, save for the one fact that its almost impossible for me to get off due to a BJ, as my head is protected by the foreskin. This doesn't stop me from being able to enjoy other sexual activities, though, so I really don't see the big difference. Whoopdie fucking doo, my skin is gone, or it isn't. Yet somehow mankind still manages to procreate and make more.

    TL;DR QFT.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Animeserf said:
    I don't see any real issue. Then again, its not like you can decide to be uncut one day, then go back to being cut to see what the difference is. I personally still have my foreskin attatched, and up until around the age of 15, I thought this completely normal. But most porn stars (lets not give them too much credit with "actors") are completely cut, which led me to ask the question. Truth is, there is no difference, save for the one fact that its almost impossible for me to get off due to a BJ, as my head is protected by the foreskin. This doesn't stop me from being able to enjoy other sexual activities, though, so I really don't see the big difference. Whoopdie fucking doo, my skin is gone, or it isn't. Yet somehow mankind still manages to procreate and make more.

    TL;DR QFT.

    So, you think having the foreskin removed is normal? Wow. You were thinking that being uncut was 'normal' until you looked at porn stars, at which point you assumed that you were not only abnormal because of your foreskin, but because your penis wasn't pumped up to 9-10 inches?

    If your foreskin causes problems when you get a bj, you have an idiot blowing you. All you have to do is PULL IT BACK. Just as people claim removing it is cleaner, all you have to do is PULL IT BACK. Amazing how PULLING IT BACK solves all the problems people have with it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Neurotic_Dragoon said:
    So, you think having the foreskin removed is normal? Wow. You were thinking that being uncut was 'normal' until you looked at porn stars, at which point you assumed that you were not only abnormal because of your foreskin, but because your penis wasn't pumped up to 9-10 inches?

    If your foreskin causes problems when you get a bj, you have an idiot blowing you. All you have to do is PULL IT BACK. Just as people claim removing it is cleaner, all you have to do is PULL IT BACK. Amazing how PULLING IT BACK solves all the problems people have with it.

    Um, no. I said I thought it was normal, and it is. I'd rather be uncut than cut, and besides, I prefer handjobs anyway. (Protip: Unlike the Japanese, most western foreskins can't be "pulled back")

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Leeham991dark said:
    Wisdom teeth aren't made of sexually sensitive tissue and protect your glans from becoming dry and insensitive. Also the removal of wisdom teeth doesn't mean you need to use lube to eat.

    That depends entirely on what you're eating.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Animeserf said:
    Protip: Unlike the Japanese, most western foreskins can't be "pulled back"

    You must have phimosis then. 100% of uncut people I know (incl. myself) can do that, and we aren't asian. Your cock is messed up. Also, your "porn stars" have cut cocks because that is what Americans/most Europeans expect to see. If they see a normal penis they will flip the fuck out just like all the cut people posting under this picture.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Animeserf said:
    My dick still hardens and ejaculates just fine. Nothing "messed up" about it. e_e

    If you can't pull it back, then something is drastically wrong. Have you *ever* pulled it back all the way? First time I did it years back it took a little stretching but it's been fine ever since.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • CameronB said:
    If you can't pull it back, then something is drastically wrong. Have you *ever* pulled it back all the way? First time I did it years back it took a little stretching but it's been fine ever since.

    Holy fuck, why are we so interested in my dick? It pulls back with a little effort, usually for routine cleaning under the foreskin. Otherwise you cannot just "pop" it back like you see in Hentai. e_e

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Alpha13Wolf said:
    You know that comment works the other way around too. Guys with cut ones tend to tjose with uncut ones Just the same.

    You know, I never see circumcised guys on e621 attacking uncircumcised guys. Only ever the other way around.

    Animeserf said:
    My dick still hardens and ejaculates just fine. Nothing "messed up" about it. e_e

    This just about sums up everything.
    Stop giving a fuck.
    Even "I HATE IT WEN U CUT BABBY" girl up there, should stop giving a fuck. It does not cease to be a penis.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • shedra said:
    I get offended when people cut pieces off live babies. That's just a pet peeve of mine.

    While I know it's mostly cultural, I agree! I think circumcision is mutilation. I mean, if GOD didn't want us to have such a thing on our male accouterments, then why are they there at birth?

    I wish to hell my folks hadn't done it to me, and if I every get blessed with a son of my own (and believe me.. it would be a run of shear luck now) I'd NEVER permit it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Sister Bear, breaks Brother Bear's baculum, leaving Brother now totally unable to bear..er.. bare.. um.. sire children!

    Film at 11!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • My parents had me circumcised, I WILL NEVER FORGIVE THEM! They had no right! It's best I never know the doc who did it as I'd probably kill them. And fuck every culture that promotes it, they can go die.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • It is a waste of perfectly good nerve-endings, any sexual stimulation is dulled by circumcision and traditionally it was only a religious practice for some weird untold reason, and some genious decided that it should be basic practice for some stupid reason, I would think that the doctors would be intelligent enough to realize what damage they would be doing and should only do it at the request of the parents beliefs.

    so in that case:

    1. You are being permanently damaged and your sex life is going to be about 1/3 as enjoyable as it possibly could have been.

    And

    2. A religiously-based ritual of mutilation happened to you before you ever had a say in the matter or even had the concept of a belief system in your mind.

    It's a bigger deal than some make it out to be.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • EpicWinNoob said:
    It is a waste of perfectly good nerve-endings, any sexual stimulation is dulled by circumcision and traditionally it was only a religious practice for some weird untold reason, and some genious decided that it should be basic practice for some stupid reason, I would think that the doctors would be intelligent enough to realize what damage they would be doing and should only do it at the request of the parents beliefs.

    so in that case:

    1. You are being permanently damaged and your sex life is going to be about 1/3 as enjoyable as it possibly could have been.

    And

    2. A religiously-based ritual of mutilation happened to you before you ever had a say in the matter or even had the concept of a belief system in your mind.

    It's a bigger deal than some make it out to be.

    Well, the only bad thing that comes out of it is a less enjoyable sex life, right?

    And who really cares about that? I mean, really?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • mrjtg12 said:
    Geeze, everyone five years ago was crazy. Why would you argue over uncut and cut penises?

    In the hope that this tradition gradually dies out sooner than later.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Narji said:
    getting Circumzised as newborn is much better than when adult (As I were when I got my circumzation it hurt like fuvk) and it ain't permanent damage such as a crushed testicle would do.

    So you're saying the babies don't experience pain? Are you also claiming that circumcision isn't permanent damage? That's what the big scar line is. How are those nerve endings? Dead! It's modern genital mutilation and yes should be illegal.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • "illegal move"... I thought this was martial arts or something for a second just checking the tags out. I guess I may just be tired.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0