nintendo and etc created by trixythespiderfox
Viewing sample resized to 66% of original (view original) Loading...
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but I see no bestiality here. All the Pokémon shown are their feral forms, not anthro.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • GoldForest said:
    Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but I see no bestiality here. All the Pokémon shown are their feral forms, not anthro.

    Lucario, Delphox, and Zoroark are shown in their natural anthro forms. To be "feral," they would have to be feralized, which they are not.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Furrin_Gok said:
    Lucario, Delphox, and Zoroark are shown in their natural anthro forms. To be "feral," they would have to be feralized, which they are not.

    If it's their "Natural" form, wouldn't that make it their feral form?

    I think that if they are shown how they are in the show, that should be their feral form. It just makes sense.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • GoldForest said:
    If it's their "Natural" form, wouldn't that make it their feral form?

    I think that if they are shown how they are in the show, that should be their feral form. It just makes sense.

    No, feral is used here to refer to a non-human phenotype, such as real world dogs, snakes, birds, etc.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • GoldForest said:
    If it's their "Natural" form, wouldn't that make it their feral form?

    I think that if they are shown how they are in the show, that should be their feral form. It just makes sense.

    Furrin_Gok said:
    No, feral is used here to refer to a non-human phenotype, such as real world dogs, snakes, birds, etc.

    Now if I may correct you both, the Zoroark and Lucario are not in "Feral" forms, as they have breasts. Pokémon do not naturally have breasts. HOWEVER, the Delphox is indeed feral, and no bestiality is present as these pokemon would naturally breed in the wild... Excluding the anthro Zoroark and Lucario, so the bestiality tag is required.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    Shadoo said:
    HOWEVER, the Delphox is indeed feral--

    Anthro (with the semi-anthro subtag), since the design is visibly based on a real animal that is not naturally bipedal. Unless you want to argue that delphox shouldn't get the canine tag.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Shadoo said:
    Now if I may correct you both, the Zoroark and Lucario are not in "Feral" forms, as they have breasts. Pokémon do not naturally have breasts. HOWEVER, the Delphox is indeed feral, and no bestiality is present as these pokemon would naturally breed in the wild... Excluding the anthro Zoroark and Lucario, so the bestiality tag is required.

    Let me repeat myself: What you're defining would be Anthrofied, not Anthro. Even if their basic form is already a bipedal form, that's still anthro. Adding breasts on, to my knowledge isn't enough to make it anthrofied, but making a pokemon who normally is not bipedal have an anthro form would be anthrofied. Say you made a glaceon stand on two legs, for example; that would be anthrofied.

    The opposite is also true: Make a Lucario a quadruped and it would be feralized. -fied and -ized tags are the ones we use for changes to the form.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Genjar said:
    Also correct. If the base form is otherwise feral, except for the breasts, it's tagged as busty_feral.

    I meant adding boobs to a boobless, but still mammal anthro. For example, Lucario don't normally have boobs.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Genjar

    Former Staff

    Furrin_Gok said:
    I meant adding boobs to a boobless, but still mammal anthro. For example, Lucario don't normally have boobs.

    Well, yeah.
    Anthro is anthro, regardless of breast size (or lack of). Breasts are more relevant to the gender tagging than to the forms.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Adding ambiguous gender because we can't see what gender the Sylveon is. Better tag what you see rather than assume it's male.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Have you considered that the bestiality tag is automatically added to posts with anthro_on_feral

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • furrin_gok said:
    Let me repeat myself: What you're defining would be Anthrofied, not Anthro. Even if their basic form is already a bipedal form, that's still anthro. Adding breasts on, to my knowledge isn't enough to make it anthrofied, but making a pokemon who normally is not bipedal have an anthro form would be anthrofied. Say you made a glaceon stand on two legs, for example; that would be anthrofied.

    Don't mind my necroing but I feel the need to clerify a part with this statement as it was originally about the delpox is indeed bipedal normally, the reason for the beastiality tag is for the Sylveon at the neathers of the zoroark

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0