At risk of being excessively pedantic...the character is feral or semi-feral with no genitals showing. The only evidence of sexual dimorphism is the pouch, which would indicate "female." Even though the picture is apparently a male character (with, for some reason, a pouch), TWYS would point to this being female, wouldn't it? (Also, "anatomically correct" as a tag specifically refers to genitalia, according to the wiki.)

Rude.

kinnelagh said:
At risk of being excessively pedantic...the character is feral or semi-feral with no genitals showing. The only evidence of sexual dimorphism is the pouch, which would indicate "female." Even though the picture is apparently a male character (with, for some reason, a pouch), TWYS would point to this being female, wouldn't it? (Also, "anatomically correct" as a tag specifically refers to genitalia, according to the wiki.)

Can read all about it in my website. I know anatomy of a ro quite well. Technically I'm a herm, yes! But I advertise it as male to make it simple. Yadda, yadda. Good to know some people know a bit of anatomy, but there's often a lot more people miss.