Viewing sample resized to 100% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1258128 that has a sibling (learn more) show ยป
Description

WEBM

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • The animation is certainly awesome, and the designs as well. It just feels a little strange to see Artica without her cock...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 58
  • LordYama said:
    The animation is certainly awesome, and the designs as well. It just feels a little strange to see Artica without her cock...

    I welcome this change! The animation and art are awesome.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 18
  • I wonder why we don't have an indie studio that produces Furry related films (beside Disney/Pixar and Dreamworks)

    Spotton_Pontential said:
    A furry movie is a bad idea even if it's not NSFW.

    Beside Zootopia:

    - Kung Fu Panda
    - Robin Hood (Disney)
    - Animal Farm (based on the George Orwell book)
    - The Rescuers
    - Antz
    - A bug's life
    There are many great films with anthropomorphic characters.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 33
  • Sputnik said:
    Great animation, awful looking characters.

    well i mean, come on, im tired of seeing the same fucking red fox yiff... white and blue is a good color scheme and aside from the over the top piercings on the girl, she aint bad at all

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Rukaisho said:
    Herms are overused in the fandom. It's nice to see a girl with NATURAL genitalia.

    shes a wolf that genitalia isnt really natural should be a canine one not a human one i mean the male has a true natural canine cock so why didnt she have something like that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
  • Skriva said:
    shes a wolf that genitalia isnt really natural should be a canine one not a human one i mean the male has a true natural canine cock so why didnt she have something like that.

    it doesn't matter, it's furries, nothing is natural.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • BetaVix said:
    You furries are like catholic church when they endorsed the theory of the big bang and labeled it as something that happened because of god. You do the same thing by taking EVERY SINGLE ANTHROPOMORPHIC CHARACTER and labeling it "furry" so you can claim all the shit you can as part of your culture WHICH ISN'T ALWAYS THE CASE.
    (fuck zootopia it's not furry it's just the biggest budgeted preachy movie)

    umad?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • BetaVix said:
    You furries are like catholic church when they endorsed the theory of the big bang and labeled it as something that happened because of god. You do the same thing by taking EVERY SINGLE ANTHROPOMORPHIC CHARACTER and labeling it "furry" so you can claim all the shit you can as part of your culture WHICH ISN'T ALWAYS THE CASE.
    (fuck zootopia it's not furry it's just the biggest budgeted preachy movie)

    Definition of a Furry:

    The furry fandom is a subculture interested in fictional anthropomorphic animal characters with human personalities and characteristics. Examples of anthropomorphic attributes include exhibiting human intelligence and facial expressions, the ability to speak, walk on two legs, and wear clothes.

    According to that, every animal character that fulfills one or more criteria can be relevant for the fandom.

    _________________

    I didn't want say that those films are made for or because of Furries, but they are relevant for the fandom since they contain anthropomorphic characters.

    Longer explaination

    In fact my point originally was that there aren't films that aim for the fandom. The examples listed above are for kids and were produced for nearly everybody.

    "Animal Farm" or "Watership Down" are curently the only western cartoon films with anthropomorphic characters for adults that come to my mind, but still not aimed at furries directly.

    For that case, "Kung Fu Panda" or "Zootopia" come closer to bipedal anthros, but aimed primary for kids.
    (Topics like racism and terrorism sure are present in Zootopia tho, but adult themes in their movies are quite common for Disney)

    And when we step aside from those films and look at animated hentais, there isn't much furry related content either compared to human porn. There are studios that produce exclusively porn for all kind of fetishes, but there's not a single one for furries.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • An argument started about something petty. How unusual! (The sarcasm is strong with this one.)

    I'm surprised that nobody has said anything about how she twists on her way back up just a few seconds into the video. *That* feels *amazing*.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • randomly I like to imagine that this is *her* car and she invited him into the driver's seat for a "joyride"...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Spotton_Pontential said:
    Mistakes can be profitable.

    I am pretty sure the movie has a lot of depth and fascinating imagery. I am pretty certain it looked amazing, had a great sense/s of humor, and all around had a great character development. The movie was hardly a mistake in anything unless you merely wish anthropomorphized characters to be drawn less like some kind of weird "purist".

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • LordYama said:
    The animation is certainly awesome, and the designs as well. It just feels a little strange to see Artica without her cock...

    I welcome anything Artica without a dong. I love her design, but I'm not a fan of herms.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0