samuel (4th of july) created by renthedragon
Viewing sample resized to 94% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #1267017 (learn more) show »
Description
Artist's Description

And the erect version! 1-2 more versions are ahead!
Was gonna make this extra cheesy by having a fountain of fireworks shooting from the tip. x3

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Hehe I love the little US insignias over the pregnant bellies. Hope to see that on the US planes in Not Your Sky 2, after the Russian planes get done with them XD.

    Great work as always

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • QuantumNova said:
    (X) doubt

    I have some models of them though. One is nicknamed the HELLHOUND II, let's just say: this thing is armed like crazy and has thick special armor that protects it from incoming threats.

    The other plane is... well... beyond supersonic, and it's design is... similar to a bird, and can do things that no other aircraft in the world can do. Not even a barrage of missiles can stop this plane. It's complex and bizzar shape makes it invisible to radar.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Ok who keeps downvoting my comments? Is someone butthurt just because they can't handle the fact that my country's technology is hyperadvanced. We got our technology from the Germans in the early 1900's then studied captured nazi tech. We had our own groundbreaking inventions though. (Small rant.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Syderen said:
    Ok who keeps downvoting my comments? Is someone butthurt just because they can't handle the fact that my country's technology is hyperadvanced. We got our technology from the Germans in the early 1900's then studied captured nazi tech. We had our own groundbreaking inventions though. (Small rant.)

    I think people are downvoting your comments because you're boasting miracle aircraft with ZERO evidence to back up it's existence. At this rate, it really sounds like you're just blowing hot air.

    To be fair, whether your claim to this aircraft's existence is real or not, I think any modern western fighters could stand a snowball's chance against the F-22, like the EF Typhoon, Dassault Mirage and Rafale. Because it wasn't engineered to take on Western or NATO aircraft, it was engineered as a MiG/Flanker killer. So the F-22 would be in untested waters if pitted against NATO aircraft. But that still doesn't change the fact that it's still highly maneuverable, and anyone who can get on an F-22's tail and stay on it without it suddenly appearing on theirs, has earned bragging rights, or the fact that radar-guided munitions are largely ineffective against it (they can't hit what they can't see).

    Bottom line; proof/facts = support. Otherwise, enjoy people downvoting comments like that.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Renthedragon said:
    "GREAT BIG TEXT WALL"

    The Hellhound II can stay of an F-22's tail. In fact the Hellhound II was made to compete against the F-22, and could pull off maneuvers that gave it the nickname "Raptor killer."

    The other aircraft I mentioned is an experimental aircraft. Due to its shape, it can't be as heavily armed as the Hellhound II but instead is to be fited with Scalar beam technology that was first invented by Nikola Tesla (There's a great article about his scalar weapon, I forget the title, just google it.)

    Funny trivia: the enemy aircraft in sky chase from Sonic Adventure resemble one of the Hellhound II's predecessors.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -4
  • Syderen said:
    The Hellhound II can stay of an F-22's tail. In fact the Hellhound II was made to compete against the F-22, and could pull off maneuvers that gave it the nickname "Raptor killer."

    The other aircraft I mentioned is an experimental aircraft. Due to its shape, it can't be as heavily armed as the Hellhound II but instead is to be fited with Scalar beam technology that was first invented by Nikola Tesla (There's a great article about his scalar weapon, I forget the title, just google it.)

    Funny trivia: the enemy aircraft in sky chase from Sonic Adventure resemble one of the Hellhound II's predecessors.

    I'm aware of what scalar technology is, but not only is that irrelevant, you once again, have provided nothing to support your claim.

    What really kills your claim is the simple fact that if I had this kind of knowledge confirming the existence of such a top secret program, I'd personally keep my mouth shut about it entirely. Otherwise, it goes against the definition of "classified". Plus, if I had that knowledge, I'd likely have a million better things to do than hang around a place like this, bragging about this cool, top secret project of mine.

    Speaking of having better things to do... Until you come back at me with actual proof, I'm done with this exchange.

    Have a good day.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1