Nice boobs, but that's some janky trigger discipline you've got going on there, lady.

It's definitely an AK 100 series. I would say that it's the 103 but the stock and hand guard give me pause.

Also, I would recommend getting a magazine that larger and doesn't jut out and is flat like floppy disk

vex714 said:
It's definitely an AK 100 series. I would say that it's the 103 but the stock and hand guard give me pause.

Also, I would recommend getting a magazine that larger and doesn't jut out and is flat like floppy disk

Dunno why the stock nor handguard would give you any pause considering the fact that the only real way to discern any of these patterns of rifles visually (AK-101/103) is the degree of angle the magazine might possess. As this magazine appears to be some kind of unorthodox reversed curve aftermarket mishmash, there is really no way to tell. Maybe she hunts and wants to give the prey a chance with a reduced capacity as opposed to a standard capacity, who knows... The handguard is standard issue, and the stock is overly caved-in at the shoulder stop.

Otherwise though, I'd commend the artist on a rather good depiction of this modern AK pattern rifle.

Praise I say, praise!

Sun's out gun's out!

This predator just got deadlier

~ArcticFoxxo~ said:
Well done Mr. Artist!

Don't promote bad trigger practices.

APFSDS-HEAT said:
Dunno why the stock nor handguard would give you any pause considering the fact that the only real way to discern any of these patterns of rifles visually (AK-101/103) is the degree of angle the magazine might possess. As this magazine appears to be some kind of unorthodox reversed curve aftermarket mishmash, there is really no way to tell. Maybe she hunts and wants to give the prey a chance with a reduced capacity as opposed to a standard capacity, who knows... The handguard is standard issue, and the stock is overly caved-in at the shoulder stop.

Otherwise though, I'd commend the artist on a rather good depiction of this modern AK pattern rifle.

Praise I say, praise!

You know your stuff. Thanks for the lesson on identification by a magazines angular measurement. It's like you said, there is no conclusive way to tell what model it is. I agree that it is a better rendition than most people's attempt at depicting the rifle.

Gotta love e621. You see good furry porn, and informative gun info! Good stuff!

IT'S BACK <3

Bless f-r95 for giving us more Mihari!

uoykcuf said:
Don't promote bad trigger practices.

Yes, of course. Anyone who sees this has to be thinking "Let's head on out with our fingers on the trigger instead of, I don't know.. LOOKING AT THE TITS?!

Why don't you complain that she doesn't have any hearing protection either... or that hot brass is going to be a trouble... Jeeze.

MorphineTae said:
Yes, of course. Anyone who sees this has to be thinking "Let's head on out with our fingers on the trigger instead of, I don't know.. LOOKING AT THE TITS?!

Why don't you complain that she doesn't have any hearing protection either... or that hot brass is going to be a trouble... Jeeze.

You know when models pose with guns that are obviously fake, clearly unloaded, or unchambered none of the things you mentioned are a problem. And you're absolutely right, since this is a chambered, loaded, real gun I could have mentioned that. But still I chose trigger discipline... Cause that's more serious? Don't pose with live guns and accidentally go deaf, burn yourself with brass, or kill someone?

Yeah there are tits, nice ones, good job on those! But don't put it in the mind of someone that it's ok to put your finger on the trigger of a gun unless you intend to fire it at something!

uoykcuf said:
You know when models pose with guns that are obviously fake, clearly unloaded, or unchambered none of the things you mentioned are a problem. And you're absolutely right, since this is a chambered, loaded, real gun I could have mentioned that. But still I chose trigger discipline... Cause that's more serious? Don't pose with live guns and accidentally go deaf, burn yourself with brass, or kill someone?

Yeah there are tits, nice ones, good job on those! But don't put it in the mind of someone that it's ok to put your finger on the trigger of a gun unless you intend to fire it at something!

If you think that a purely fictional work is insturctional in any way shape or form you got a lot more trouble than finger dicipline.

MorphineTae said:
If you think that a purely fictional work is insturctional in any way shape or form you got a lot more trouble than finger dicipline.

I think you need to re-read your last comment to understand how off base it really is... Movies, video games, books, cartoons, live action shows, and illustrations have effected the cultural understanding of guns world wide. And it's part of the creator's responsibilities to get things right!

uoykcuf said:
I think you need to re-read your last comment to understand how off base it really is... Movies, video games, books, cartoons, live action shows, and illustrations have effected the cultural understanding of guns world wide. And it's part of the creator's responsibilities to get things right!

And if you're learning gun safety from furry porn instead of an actual instructor you're an idiot.

That was my point. Do you disagree?

MorphineTae said:
And if you're learning gun safety from furry porn instead of an actual instructor you're an idiot.

That was my point. Do you disagree?

No I don't disagree, but that doesn't make my point any less valid? Cause there are idiots and children everywhere? Including here. And if movies, books, and other art consistently shows that idiot or child it's ok and they finally get a hold of a gun... Well, that's my point. Why be yet another piece in this giant problem?

The pointless multi-paragraph /k/tards arguing in the comments. My favourite part of any furry image where the artist decides to draw a gun.

Grand to the Picture

Her leg pouches are upside down

If she is hunting, some hunting laws allow you to use a semi-auto rifles to hunt with but with the restriction of a 10 round clip

uoykcuf said:
No I don't disagree, but that doesn't make my point any less valid? Cause there are idiots and children everywhere? Including here. And if movies, books, and other art consistently shows that idiot or child it's ok and they finally get a hold of a gun... Well, that's my point. Why be yet another piece in this giant problem?

Yes, because not drawing porn correctly is totally the problem with American gun culture, not the fetishizaiton of weaponry or the beleive that the constiution gives us the right to wage a futile war if we see fit because Obama is going to take our guns.

MorphineTae said:
Yes, because not drawing porn correctly is totally the problem with American gun culture, not the fetishizaiton of weaponry or the beleive that the constiution gives us the right to wage a futile war if we see fit because Obama is going to take our guns.

You know how we're drawing ire by continuing this? I love it.

And you are pointing out two more wonderful problems with gun culture. And this is a fraction of the gun fetish. "I love guns so much I want it in my porn." Thus porn with gun. And done poorly. Which feeds into more bad gun knowledge being fed around. Leads back around to my point!

I will not argue gun rights however, so your second diversionary clause goes rightly unheeded.

Fenrick said:
I don't understand the notion that it would be futile at all.

Have you heard of the Vietnam War? Afghanistan? This might surprise you, but a revolution doesn't involve fighting the military in some kind of conventional war. I'm not even a prepper or in favor of revolution but you're ignoring the reality if you make the "Can't win against muh drones" case.

Securing any means for a revolution might not make sense... if you forget how the US was formed.

People fetishize cars, too, anyway.

A> Look how well that turned out. We're still fighitng pointless wars in far off lands.

And B> then you wouldn't need your guns at all.

And it might make sense if you realize that the world has changed a ton since the American revolution. I mean blacks are no longer property and women can vote for example.

Also, good luck with your AR against drones and tanks.

Also, I want to ask "Do you think that the horse porn here is going to result in another Mr Hands?" Because that's the same logic as bitching about trigger dicipline on this picture.

apfsds-heat said:
Dunno why the stock nor handguard would give you any pause considering the fact that the only real way to discern any of these patterns of rifles visually (AK-101/103) is the degree of angle the magazine might possess. As this magazine appears to be some kind of unorthodox reversed curve aftermarket mishmash, there is really no way to tell. Maybe she hunts and wants to give the prey a chance with a reduced capacity as opposed to a standard capacity, who knows... The handguard is standard issue, and the stock is overly caved-in at the shoulder stop.

Otherwise though, I'd commend the artist on a rather good depiction of this modern AK pattern rifle.

Praise I say, praise!

Looks like a Saiga or Molot Hunter series with an aftermarket stock due to the mag and reciver, but other than that, defiantely an AK-100 type weapon. Well drawn overall!

vex714 said:
It's definitely an AK 100 series. I would say that it's the 103 but the stock and hand guard give me pause.

Also, I would recommend getting a magazine that larger and doesn't jut out and is flat like floppy disk

it's a saiga .410 shotgun. civilian line of the ak-100 series to come out in the 90s. russian imports had to be sporterized, but these kept the integral folding stock.