dexter and shuki created by demicoeur
Viewing sample resized to 93% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Tidal Wave Pg. #12

Shuki gets what she wants ;P

You can buy a printed copy of the completed Tidal Wave on FurPlanet !

Tidal Wave and all my comics are brought to you by the generosity of my patrons on Patreon. Thanks so much for contributing! If you'd like to see these comics early and get additional artwork/content, please consider pledging!

<<< PREV | FIRST | NEXT >>>

  • Comments
  • Daneasaur said:
    Yeah, you could have done it a whole lot sooner if she wasn't whoring out to everything with a penis.

    And at what point was she doing this?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • CCoyote said:
    Someone's just butthurt because the characters have sex with more partners than he thinks they should.

    In my opinion, the thing that sucks about that is she used someone just to try and fulfill her fantasy. In that, she was in a relationship with a guy and having sex, but was fantasizing about someone else. That's fucked up. And none of that even compares to the cringy ending to this comic. No offense to the artist meant, we all like what we like, but this comic's ending is like a horny teenager's wet dream. Turns out there are a BUNCH of other people on the beach (All coincidentally extremely attractive) and they all have a giant orgy.

    For those of us who hate that kind of thing, here's a simple solution. When downloading this comic:

    Cut off the bottom of page 15 (Where they realize they're being watched) and skip all the way to the final page. That way, the entire orgy is skipped and it ends on them finally realizing and appreciating their love for each other. Enjoy!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
  • CCoyote said:
    Someone's just butthurt because the characters have sex with more partners than he thinks they should.

    So much that when I called her a slut that they downvotes me.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • CCoyote said:
    Someone's just butthurt because the characters have sex with more partners than he thinks they should.

    it has literally nothing to do with having sex with many partners, at least for me (it's just being used as a metaphor for being in a relationship), it's all about being-in-a-relationship-with-someone-you-don't-love-so-you-can't-tell-the-person-you-do-love-that-you-love-him. repeatedly, during apparently many relationships, for many years.
    what's even the point of having a "romantic" relationship if you clearly love someone else? if you need sex so much just be fuckbuddies, so you can easily grab the important guy as soon as he's free.

    CCoyote said:
    BTW, I really like this part. Presenting a solution is much better than the judgmental and pharisaical comments others have made. Thank you for that.

    so your white knight-y attitude made you not notice the fact that "Yeah, you could have done it a whole lot sooner if she wasn't whoring out to everything with a penis." is also presenting a solution, and not just insulting her? alright.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • I appreciate that the narrative is told from the point of view of the female character, therefore, we only know that she's the one who's had a string of casual flings. I'm just going to point out that it appears that it is clearly implied that the male character has had his share of relationships, so it's unlikely he's a paragon of virginal purity, but nobody's bothering to call him a man-whore.

    I also don't think what she did was necessarily right, or healthy. But I'm really struggling to figure out why some people are getting their panties so vehemently in a bunch here. I'm probably going to get downvoted to hell for saying this here, but I suspect the vitriol is directed towards her not just because she's the narrator, but also because people still want to believe in a love fairy tale. Or maybe it has something to do with most of you reading this being heterosexual (enough) males who have at least once in your life thought either that a girl was, or could have, or even SHOULD have been into you except she was banging someone else and that made you salty and want to moralise against not getting your whistle wet, ESPECIALLY when it seemed that so many other douches were getting theirs.

    I would know. I've been there. But while her behaviour during her period of delayed self-honesty isn't the most healthy thing, being that salty is only gonna drive up your blood pressure.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • procrastinator said:
    (...) I suspect the vitriol is directed towards her not just because she's the narrator, but also because people still want to believe in a love fairy tale. (...)

    the problem with your brain dump here is that this whole setup is an unrealistic fairy tale that we DON'T like.

    procrastinator said:
    (...) Or maybe it has something to do with most of you reading this being heterosexual (enough) males who have at least once in your life thought either that a girl was, or could have, or even SHOULD have been into you except she was banging someone else and that made you salty and want to moralise against not getting your whistle wet, ESPECIALLY when it seemed that so many other douches were getting theirs. (...)

    and here the problem is that this story is NOT being told from the perspective of the guy who thinks what you think that we think, that we associate with and thus want his dreams to be fulfilled, or something like that.
    no, it's quite the opposite. it's told from the perspective of the girl, and from her own admission, she IS in love with the guy, and she WANTS to be with him, but shes just too stupid to solve that tiny problem.

    now, of course, it seems that he's just as incompetent in life and relationships, but that doesn't make her innocent.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -2
  • procrastinator said:
    I appreciate that the narrative is told from the point of view of the female character, therefore, we only know that she's the one who's had a string of casual flings. I'm just going to point out that it appears that it is clearly implied that the male character has had his share of relationships, so it's unlikely he's a paragon of virginal purity, but nobody's bothering to call him a man-whore.

    I also don't think what she did was necessarily right, or healthy. But I'm really struggling to figure out why some people are getting their panties so vehemently in a bunch here. I'm probably going to get downvoted to hell for saying this here, but I suspect the vitriol is directed towards her not just because she's the narrator, but also because people still want to believe in a love fairy tale. Or maybe it has something to do with most of you reading this being heterosexual (enough) males who have at least once in your life thought either that a girl was, or could have, or even SHOULD have been into you except she was banging someone else and that made you salty and want to moralise against not getting your whistle wet, ESPECIALLY when it seemed that so many other douches were getting theirs.

    I would know. I've been there. But while her behaviour during her period of delayed self-honesty isn't the most healthy thing, being that salty is only gonna drive up your blood pressure.

    To quote myself on an earlier page; it if was obvious that he was having multiple relationships and not just one that ended on a sour note, I'd call him out on it, and I somewhat have been, as I'm merciless to the very mindset of "oh he/she is so hot and we get along so well but I'm gonna fuck this person over here because otherwise it'll ruin our relationship and I'll never drop any hints that I want them and will run off with the first thing with a dick/vagina that will have me while I pine pointlessly over how I didn't have the balls/ovaries/spine to tell them to their face that I want to jump their bones."

    It's stupid.

    Heck, the whole "you're so wet" is probably because she just got done taking a load from some dude earlier that morning.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • These are fair points. Also, I confess, I already knew this wasn't going to be a plot I liked, so I didn't actually read any of it until I coincidentally saw a promising thumbnail on the popular page and lo and behold here I am again. Then again, it seems I probably didn't miss much (story wise).

    Shingen said:
    the problem with your brain dump here is that this whole setup is an unrealistic fairy tale that we DON'T like.

    Yeah I didn't phrase myself very well. What I meant was, on subject matter like this, people are going to be prone to using the fairy-tale and its themes as their yardstick.

    Inflammatory remarks aside, my other point was that yes, her narration reveals that she was being a bit daft. However, I find comments saying to her that it's better off waiting a bit presumptuous since it kind of implies that she should wait for the guy to finish bonking whoever he's doing so she can declare her love for him. Again, I've been there enough to tell you: it doesn't always work out, and maybe if it does in retrospect you can then say, oh, damn, I was stupid. But before the fact, there's always a bit of self-doubt, of rationalisation and second-guessing and people not being awfully good at being honest with themselves or really figuring it out. These are common things, in other words, people are stupid. So to all the people getting really angry here: If you really want to hold everybody to the standard you hold her, you must all be pretty angry people.

    And just to broaden the scope a bit, you have to concede, even if it's not directly relevant here, a huge proportion of the images here *do* glorify heteronormative womanising. And slut shaming. It's still worth keeping in the back of your mind every time you open up your can of vitriol.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Nesrow said:
    In my opinion, the thing that sucks about that is she used someone just to try and fulfill her fantasy. In that, she was in a relationship with a guy and having sex, but was fantasizing about someone else. That's fucked up. And none of that even compares to the cringy ending to this comic. No offense to the artist meant, we all like what we like, but this comic's ending is like a horny teenager's wet dream. Turns out there are a BUNCH of other people on the beach (All coincidentally extremely attractive) and they all have a giant orgy.

    For those of us who hate that kind of thing, here's a simple solution. When downloading this comic:

    Cut off the bottom of page 15 (Where they realize they're being watched) and skip all the way to the final page. That way, the entire orgy is skipped and it ends on them finally realizing and appreciating their love for each other. Enjoy!

    Looked up the comic on U18chan. Wow. What a shit comic.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • I'm wondering why people who apparently "don't like" this comic or its narrative/story are being all "keyboard warrior"... Ffs guys/girls its PORN, it's bound to be fiction/fantasy, especially when we are on a furry porn site. And to top this off, this comic is only a thing cause of Demi's patrons, so maybe the story isn't demicoeurs idea. I mean if you go read cinderfrost and compare that to this then yes this "story" isn't appealing to alot of people.

    I would like to know how many chaste people or people who only had one person in their life whom they had sex with, since the fact that the female in the comic gets so much hate for fucking a few dudes :-P

    It's also a shame that alot of artist will be put off of posting their artwork on free websites because of all the critique they receive, just because of a plot or story that might be or not be their own idea isn't what tickles your horny switch.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • I'm a little confused about the bitter anger over this woman's life choices. Just because the comic is depicting someone making decisions you think are stupid doesn't mean that the author is implying she was doing the right thing. Hell, you look at the ending, and it's quite the opposite: she's considering how all along she only needed to 'take the next step' if she wanted to hook up with the guy.

    Reminds me of that comic by Kabier where everyone was getting furious about the main character being completely idiotic. Nobody looked at the HEAVILY suggestive front cover of the comic and thought "Oh, maybe the entire point is that she IS a fucking dumbass, and she's going to learn the hard way not to be a stupid entitled brat".

    Main characters don't have to be smart. They don't even have to be likeable. Maybe consider that before y'all throw a fit about a fictional character in a porno comic not being perfect.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 5
  • InfernalLawyer said:

    Main characters don't have to be smart. They don't even have to be likeable. Maybe consider that before y'all throw a fit about a fictional character in a porno comic not being perfect.

    Exactly. It's a porn comic. The MC just needs to be hot.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • InfernalLawyer said:
    Main characters don't have to be smart. They don't even have to be likeable. Maybe consider that before y'all throw a fit about a fictional character in a porno comic not being perfect.

    111111111 said:
    Exactly. It's a porn comic. The MC just needs to be hot.

    Considering the rage that came about due to said MC's being stupid, I think you might be wrong.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Daneasaur said:
    Considering the rage that came about due to said MC's being stupid, I think you might be wrong.

    Just because people are angry, doesn't mean they're right to be so. For reasons I've already given.

    I mean, why does it make you upset? I'm serious here, help me understand why some dumb MC making dumb choices riles you up so much.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • InfernalLawyer said:
    Just because people are angry, doesn't mean they're right to be so. For reasons I've already given.

    I mean, why does it make you upset? I'm serious here, help me understand why some dumb MC making dumb choices riles you up so much.

    When making a porn comic, don't stress any sort of story, don't have much story at all.

    If you make a story, then the story needs to make sense and be appealing.

    The story aspect remains the same regardless if it is an action comic, sex comic, or comedy comic.

    If you don't want the characters to come out looking like total dumbasses, you need to put thought into the story. Don't wanna put thought into the story? Don't MAKE a story, just start with sex/action/comedy and stay there.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • If you don't want the characters to come out looking like total dumbasses, you need to put thought into the story. Don't wanna put thought into the story? Don't MAKE a story, just start with sex/action/comedy and stay there.

    First off, sorry this is very late, I wouldn't be surprised if you've wandered off by now.

    Anyway... Again, have you ever considered that the MC being a dumbass was intentional? I don't read to come across as condescending, but my original comment pretty explicitly pointed out that it's not exactly unrealistic to create characters who behave idiotically, much less 'cause the entire story to make no sense". Yeah, she "comes out looking like a total dumbass". So what? Have you never seen an idiot before in your life?

    I can understand not being able to get off from this kind of character. You do you, and after all, hating the MC for being stupid/whiny/jerkish/etc is hardly exclusive to porn comics. But the bitter anger and insistence that a character isn't *allowed* to be stupid, (because apparently every single character has to be thinking logically for the story to make any sense)... it's ironically an unrealistic and illogical expectation.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • A lot of slut-shaming in the comments. Y'all acting pretty high and mighty for people browsing furry porn.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0