hey guys quit removing the ambiguous gender tag. there is two characters in this image and the ambiguous gender tag is for whoever is grabbing on the girl's tail

From what I can tell, you should only tag genders for characters that are explicitly part of the image. I'm fairly sure that a disembodied hand doesn't count. "Duo" probably isn't appropriate fore the same reason.

rysmarin said:
From what I can tell, you should only tag genders for characters that are explicitly part of the image. I'm fairly sure that a disembodied hand doesn't count. "Duo" probably isn't appropriate fore the same reason.

its clearly written with clear examples in solo focus tag's wiki page that images with one character and disembodied body part of another character gets tagged as solo_focus and duo. so i really recommend that you familiarize yourself with usage of tags by reading their wiki pages.

also gender tags need to be tagged for every single character, including characters that are even partially visible in image.

Commander_Eggplant said:
also gender tags need to be tagged for every single character, including characters that are even partially visible in image.

It looks like there was some discussion on this question on forum #134072, and the general consensus was that tagging ambiguous_gender in these cases was not that helpful because it seems unlikely that someone searching for that tag would want to see disembodied_hand posts.

What a romantic setting for love making.

fenestra said:
It looks like there was some discussion on this question on forum #134072, and the general consensus was that tagging ambiguous_gender in these cases was not that helpful because it seems unlikely that someone searching for that tag would want to see disembodied_hand posts.

that is from 3 years ago. the tagging policies have changed since. heres a more recent thread where multiple admins state that tags need to be used normally even on partially visible things or things that are not primary focus