Save this flash (right click and save)

Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • @Km-15, 32 MB is... quite large.

    You should definitely consider using video formats instead for several reasons. I though this was just simple loop at first but after a minute there's actually finish on this, because there's no seekbar it's not immidiately visible. Using video would also work on mobile, making gif version not that necessary and the filesize is significantly smaller from this flash.
    https://puu.sh/yjCKR/eeb710af2d.webm

    5 MB is already much better, even has your name in metadata so viewer knows who made it even if they got it somewhere else than here.

    Of course alternatively or preferabely in conjunction alkso indicate with animation itself that it's continuing instead of looping. Slight changes in rhythm and eye blinking are one ways, but these could also been seen as randomized with flash. Of course this means much more work, but will keep the viewer much more interested until the end.

    And speaking of gif, you can use better dithering method which would have less pixel shifting and visible noise happening. Compare above eevees tail or right of glaceons ear for example in post #1376248 with https://puu.sh/yjCLA/84395b3fe1.gif

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
  • Mario69 said:
    @Km-15, 32 MB is... quite large.

    You should definitely consider using video formats instead for several reasons. I though this was just simple loop at first but after a minute there's actually finish on this, because there's no seekbar it's not immidiately visible. Using video would also work on mobile, making gif version not that necessary and the filesize is significantly smaller from this flash.
    https://puu.sh/yjCKR/eeb710af2d.webm

    5 MB is already much better, even has your name in metadata so viewer knows who made it even if they got it somewhere else than here.

    Of course alternatively or preferabely in conjunction alkso indicate with animation itself that it's continuing instead of looping. Slight changes in rhythm and eye blinking are one ways, but these could also been seen as randomized with flash. Of course this means much more work, but will keep the viewer much more interested until the end.

    And speaking of gif, you can use better dithering method which would have less pixel shifting and visible noise happening. Compare above eevees tail or right of glaceons ear for example in post #1376248 with https://puu.sh/yjCLA/84395b3fe1.gif

    I'll try it next time.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • It's a shame this was so poorly optimized. By which I mean it wasn't optimized at all. The thing about Flash is you can reuse a frame of animation 10000 times and it'll never increase the filesize. That what makes it great for long looping seqences. That and the ability to add buttons. This could be remade at about a 10th of the size, probably less, and with a button to activate the cum scene would be much better.
    I'd do it for you right now if I had the .FLA file for it. (must be saved compatible for CS6 or lower)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Not bad but playtime is absurdly long...could proly use some buttons to control when it cums or at least a much shorter loop.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1