the bottomless district created by zaush
Viewing sample resized to 53% of original (view original) Loading...
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Description

"
Brought to you by no9 and my supporters on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/zaush

Please consider lending your support so I can devote more of my time to furry art. Patrons get to see my art two weeks earlier than anyone else, have access to work in progress updates, art streams, HD versions of art, and can help vote on ideas for my next work. Take a peek!

I'm loving how this turned out!

This piece is for No9, depicting a sort of slave pony girl who gets bound up in the basement for his guests' use. I made the background in blender and rendered with renderman, adding some overpainting in photoshop.

High res version for my patrons:
https://www.patreon.com/posts/15257317 "

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • Ha! I knew by the thumbnail it was Zaush pic by the bull. For some reason he's very... Zaushy.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • Equinok said:
    It's a shame that Adam Wan's art is so good but him as a human being is so scummy.

    It's a shame people keep bringing it up for no apparent reason other than wanting to stir up shit.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
  • Well, this is a nice surprise. A female equine by Zaush? I just realized how infrequently he draws females that aren't canines or otters...

    Anyway, I have a thing for mares with bulls as lovers, so this makes me very happy.

    AlexanderMugetsu said:
    Well for a start this a rape pic, so that's something to add for reason.

    1. Bondage/BDSM isn't inherently rape.

    2. Are you okay with rape roleplay? If so, rape art is the same in that it's merely the expression of a fantasy that plays out in the way whoever has the fantasy wants it to (which doesn't always have to be about the victim being miserable/the aggressor being a sadist).

    I know characters in art can rape roleplay, but to do that to not seem supportive of actual rape is akin to having characters in media brutally assaulting one another constantly remind the audience that nobody is actually getting hurt to not appear to advocate for senseless violence in real life. That isn't to suggest that I think it's silly to do either of those things for other reasons (especially if you're attempting to world build in the former instance)!

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • hsauq said:
    Well, this is a nice surprise. A female equine by Zaush? I just realized how infrequently he draws females that aren't canines or otters...

    Anyway, I have a thing for mares with bulls as lovers, so this makes me very happy.

    1. Bondage/BDSM isn't inherently rape.

    2. Are you okay with rape roleplay? If so, rape art is the same in that it's merely the expression of a fantasy that plays out in the way whoever has the fantasy wants it to (which doesn't always have to be about the victim being miserable/the aggressor being a sadist).

    I know characters in art can rape roleplay, but to do that to not seem supportive of actual rape is akin to having characters in media brutally assaulting one another constantly remind the audience that nobody is actually getting hurt to not appear to advocate for senseless violence in real life. That isn't to suggest that I think it's silly to do either of those things for other reasons (especially if you're attempting to world build in the former instance)!

    1) I know that. Have little problem with BDSM really.

    2) It's fine so long as people keep it to themselves. It ain't the sort of thing to leave the bedroom, but it's not real rape, just roleplaying, like student/teacher for example.

    But this is neither. It says so in the tags.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • AlexanderMugetsu said:
    1) I know that. Have little problem with BDSM really.

    ...

    But this is neither. It says so in the tags.

    Now it's doesn't. Because I removed the rape tag. Being in the tags doesn't make it true. I imagine that SilkywereRedux added the tag based on the fact that it's bondage/BDSM (which isn't mutually exclusive from rape either).

    This is questionable_consent, at the very most. If you want to add it, I won't remove it.

    AlexanderMugetsu said:
    2) It's fine so long as people keep it to themselves. It ain't the sort of thing to leave the bedroom, but it's not real rape, just roleplaying, like student/teacher for example.

    Why should people keep their rape fantasies to themselves any more than they do their furry fantasies? Plenty of people, even some furries, are disgusted by furry porn.

    Unless they're forcing you to look at rape art, just accept that many people may like fantasizing about things that you might not and actively avoid those things. Booru websites like e621 have blacklist functions for this very purpose and it's only effective with accurate tagging (though, what counts as accurate tagging or, in this site's case, "tag what you see" isn't always agreed upon).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • hsauq said:
    Now it's doesn't. Because I removed the rape tag. Being in the tags doesn't make it true. I imagine that SilkywereRedux added the tag based on the fact that it's bondage/BDSM (which isn't mutually exclusive from rape either).

    This is questionable_consent, at the very most. If you want to add it, I won't remove it.

    Why should people keep their rape fantasies to themselves any more than they do their furry fantasies? Plenty of people, even some furries, are disgusted by furry porn.

    Unless they're forcing you to look at rape art, just accept that many people may like fantasizing about things that you might not and actively avoid those things. Booru websites like e621 have blacklist functions for this very purpose and it's only effective with accurate tagging (though, what counts as accurate tagging or, in this site's case, "tag what you see" isn't always agreed upon).

    It said rape in the tags, so It's fair to assume I would have called this a rape piece. If it didn't have one, I wouldn't call it this.

    I don't want people to talk about their furry fantasies as muhc as their rape fantasias.

    I don't wanna know about anyone's fantasias. It's nothing I should, or want to, care about.

  • Reply
  • |
  • -3
  • Justusschultz said:
    I think they're referring to the artist's obsession with cuckolding, which is generally a turn-off for most.

    "For most"? The largely positive score indicates that most are quite into it. If the majority didn't like this, it would have a negative score.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Equinok said:
    It's a shame that Adam Wan's art is so good but him as a human being is so scummy.

    In b4 ban.

    Also slavery and BDSM are entirely different concepts and Adam is outright saying she's a slave so this IS rape not "questionable consent". Slaves cannot consent to sex (and she clearly isn't enjoying it).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 3
  • SoulFlame said:
    I don't wanna be the guy who has to clean that carpet...

    Knowing the people here you could probably get a dozen volunteers to wanna clean it with their tongue.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1