You must be logged in to view this image. (learn more)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • sometink tells me Rainbow Dash ain't there for Winsor, but just for fluttershy's tight pony pussy and pert pony butt.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • 78uh said:
    "Bestiality is the practice of sex between humans and animals"
    Removing Bestiality tag...

    And yet they put it back -_-

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1
  • Apparently they think because they feral horses can talk they are anthro. But because this is all feral, it would not be bestiality.
    Unfortunately, people are stupid.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • On a site where art involving non-human characters that are sentient is common, the definition of bestiality becomes re-defined to "sex between a sentient organism and a non-sentient organism." Winona is non-sentient. The rest of the characters in this image are sentient. Thus, bestiality.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • Jacob said:
    On a site where art involving non-human characters that are sentient is common, the definition of bestiality becomes re-defined to "sex between a sentient organism and a non-sentient organism." Winona is non-sentient. The rest of the characters in this image are sentient. Thus, bestiality.

    You sir, are an idiot. Do you even know what sentient means? It means you are able to perceive or feel things. Dogs are sentient.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Icematic said:
    You sir, are an idiot. Do you even know what sentient means? It means you are able to perceive or feel things. Dogs are sentient.

    Robots can perceive and feel things. Does that make them sentient?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Icematic said:
    You sir, are an idiot. Do you even know what sentient means? It means you are able to perceive or feel things. Dogs are sentient.

    You, sir, are the idiot. If that were what sentient meant, then every living thing on the planet that wasn't a plant, a fungus, or a microscopic organism would be classified as sentient. Hell, even some plants and micro organisms would count.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • Jacob said:
    You, sir, are the idiot. If that were what sentient meant, then every living thing on the planet that wasn't a plant, a fungus, or a microscopic organism would be classified as sentient. Hell, even some plants and micro organisms would count.

    You, sir, are the idiot. You clearly don't know the definition of "Percieve."

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • UnderWater said:
    You, sir, are the idiot. You clearly don't know the definition of "Percieve."

    Perceive (which is the correct spelling, by the way) means "to become aware of through the senses." In other words, to see it, smell it, hear it, taste it...etcettera. And even if you go with the more abstract form of the word, like the version meant when one talks of "perceived threats," where it means to imagine something or conceive of its existence within your mind, there's still plenty of non-sentient creatures on this planet capable of perceiving things. So, yes, I know the definition, and my point to Icematic is still valid.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • fredsite said:
    This whole chat is hilarious. Honestly. Everyone being so polite and courteous as they insult each other's intelligence. I find it fascinating how Icematic, Jacob, and UnderWater can carry such an argument over a tag. Here is my two cents (forgive my use of a cliché). I think that since in the My Little Pony universe, ponies are the "humans" of Equestria. Especially in Friendship is Magic, where there are no humans or other civilized (ugh) races besides equines , griffins, and dragons, I think that bestiality has a shifted meaning. I think that, if bestiality exists canonically (which it never will), it would mean, "intercourse between equines/griffins (possibly even dragons) and non-equines/griffins (dragons)," and inter species sex would be between equines and griffins (and/or possibly dragons) or between non-equines/griffins. Long explanation aside, I believe that this picture should have both tags, however, I'm not willing to change it, seeing as popular consensus seems to be no bestiality tag. Have fun arguing over that, and good day.

    That's been my whole point this entire time. I mean, it'd be like taking a picture of a dwarf fucking a dog and switching the tag from "bestiality" to "inter-species" because there's no human in the picture. Buut, since the staff has ruled feral-on-feral is NOT bestiality, even if one feral is sentient...*Shrugs.* Nothing we can do about it, I suppose.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I'm was that intrigue (I was bored) on what you guys have to say about tags, that I read every single one of them.

    Jacob said:
    That's been my whole point this entire time. I mean, it'd be like taking a picture of a dwarf fucking a dog and switching the tag from "bestiality" to "inter-species" because there's no human in the picture. Buut, since the staff has ruled feral-on-feral is NOT bestiality, even if one feral is sentient...*Shrugs.* Nothing we can do about it, I suppose.

    fredsite said:
    This whole chat is hilarious. Honestly. Everyone being so polite and courteous as they insult each other's intelligence. I find it fascinating how Icematic, Jacob, and UnderWater can carry such an argument over a tag. Here is my two cents (forgive my use of a cliché). I think that since in the My Little Pony universe, ponies are the "humans" of Equestria. Especially in Friendship is Magic, where there are no humans or other civilized (ugh) races besides equines , griffins, and dragons, I think that bestiality has a shifted meaning. I think that, if bestiality exists canonically (which it never will), it would mean, "intercourse between equines/griffins (possibly even dragons) and non-equines/griffins (dragons)," and inter species sex would be between equines and griffins (and/or possibly dragons) or between non-equines/griffins. Long explanation aside, I believe that this picture should have both tags, however, I'm not willing to change it, seeing as popular consensus seems to be no bestiality tag. Have fun arguing over that, and good day.

    Jacob said:
    Perceive (which is the correct spelling, by the way) means "to become aware of through the senses." In other words, to see it, smell it, hear it, taste it...etcettera. And even if you go with the more abstract form of the word, like the version meant when one talks of "perceived threats," where it means to imagine something or conceive of its existence within your mind, there's still plenty of non-sentient creatures on this planet capable of perceiving things. So, yes, I know the definition, and my point to Icematic is still valid.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
  • I looked up the artist in the tags and I'm not sure it's the right one. I also couldn't find this pic in their FA gallery. The artist in question has such... different style.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0